Posts: 585
Threads: 10
Joined: Dec 2007
Sunrise, how about a game with restrictions that don't make sense?
Like, "Play ranked with and out-annoy Seyruun on Teamspeak, use of vuvuzelas encouraged"
(advertisement: pocketbeetle carried me through a ton of both normal and ranked games today; play with pb guys, he has a very good voice too!)
Posts: 2,260
Threads: 58
Joined: Oct 2010
Sir Bruce Wrote:One way to do challenges with free weeks is to do multiple-champion challenges. Say "fastest to kill dragon" with 3 different free champions, and scores are based on the sum of the times.
I like this idea, since it would still leave some choice to the player. Maybe it would be worth thinking about this variant with an empty rune page ?!
sunrise089 Wrote:We could also alternate, like Gentle vs Extreme Civ Adventures. We could do the next challenge with restrictions that make sense and then do another with none.
I am not sure I can follow you  . Do you mean restrictions in champion choice ?
Because Gentle vs Extreme Adventure seems like something different to me.
IIRC the Extreme Adventures were hard to finish at all (or impossible for some players like me  ). I doubt you can really find a challenge like that for LoL, except imposing things like a strict time limit, but I don't see the advantage compared to using a time ranking...
Posts: 545
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2005
Gustaran Wrote:IIRC the Extreme Adventures were hard to finish at all (or impossible for some players like me ). I doubt you can really find a challenge like that for LoL
Fastest solo Baron, no gear?
Posts: 6,471
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2006
Well the gentle adventures were supposed to be more accessible, right?
So a "only free champs, only level 1 runes, no masteries" challenge, while maybe harder to complete, doesn't exclude based on IP levels. You can alternate in an "everything goes" challenge, which while maybe easier to complete, divides people based on champs and runes and whatnot.
Note I said level 1 runes allowed above instead of no runes. In my mind that's clearly superior. It gives us 75% of the benefit of runes, and a low enough cost that a single afternoon spent playing can afford the set.
Posts: 1,075
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2010
sunrise089 Wrote:Note I said level 1 runes allowed above instead of no runes. In my mind that's clearly superior. It gives us 75% of the benefit of runes, and a low enough cost that a single afternoon spent playing can afford the set.
I think I nuked all my level one runes- I never bought many in the first place and those I did buy I think I converted because I was curious what it did.
But, as you said, they're cheap, so should be a problem.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
Been cranking up assists tonight.. First a 0-0-6 victory with you guys in lvl30's game, then a 2-0-8 (at on point 0-0-8.) victory at my own level :P
Posts: 2,504
Threads: 29
Joined: Oct 2009
Hmm, i updated my version of the game tonight to try and play but it's gone all funky. For some reason, when i move my mouse to the edge of the screen, it doesn't 'scroll' along the map like it used to. The camera is permanently fixed on my character. This makes it impossible to kill, see enemies etc. I'm probly being dumb but i cant work out how to fix it. Any ideas?
EDIT: Yes. i was being dumb. There is a button that toggles camera fix on your character next to the scoreboard. Just in case anyone else tries to play under the influence and gets frustrated
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
April 9th, 2011, 00:52
(This post was last modified: April 9th, 2011, 01:15 by Gustaran.)
Posts: 2,260
Threads: 58
Joined: Oct 2010
After an impressive 3:52, uberfish follows up with a fabulous time of 3:43, making him the new scoreboard leader (-2 sec bonus):
Ranking updated:
1. uberfish 3:41
2. Sir Bruce 3:51
3. Cull 4:02
4. Dantski 5:01
5. Enoch 5:10
6. Gustaran 6:47
7. Jowy 11:12
Will Sir Bruce reclaim the number 1 spot once again ? Stay tuned ! 
Posts: 468
Threads: 2
Joined: Dec 2009
3:43?  That is mighty impressive, uberfish.
That sounds to me like 3 smites starting at 1:40 (or a level 2 kill). But I can't figure out how to kill stuff fast enough then. Need to keep thinking...
|
