Serdoa Wrote:B) I might be wrong but I am pretty sure that I was on novice before the seer told us something. I think it was zakalwe who even thanked me for that as I argued pretty strongly with him because of him being blinded by novice. But I ask again, what is your point here? Should we lynch zakalwe no matter his alignment? Is that your idea of good villager play?You might have been on him but without the seer you wouldn't have gotten the lynch. And to your question: in short yes if he uses his vote-swaying power to protect wolves.
Serdoa Wrote:C) And that is something I don't believe but oh well, it seems we have this game several players who try gambits which seem ridiculous for me.
Btw: No offense meant Rowain. I think you are a strong player, but I will have to think about for some time if I really believe your point C).
Good. Thinking is what I ask you to do.
Another point to think about: In WW6 as long as 1 or 2 wolves were high in the running the votes were widespread and not focused. As soon as 2 villagers led the run (myself, Selrahc) those shot far ahead of the others quite fast.