September 28th, 2011, 12:58
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
Rowain Wrote:You have no vote on you so why are you still so frantic? I'm not frantic, I'm making a comment about your playing style which I see as mildly harmful to the village. I think your response is puzzling, but I'm not sure if I should interpret it as guilt or innocence. You then jump on Winston, to draw attention to anyone but you? I still think we're just tossing a d11, but you don't seem like a bad guess based on what little leads we have.
September 28th, 2011, 13:00
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
Ah and suddenly you sound far surer than before.
BTw a little informational tally:
3: Rowain ( Catwalk, Novice, Injera )
3: Winston Hughes ( Lewwyn, Uberfish, Rowain )
1: Lewwyn ( Winston Hughes )
1: Novice ( Serdoa )
1: Catwalk ( Erebus )
1: Erebus ( Sareln )
1: Sareln ( Bobchillingworth )
September 28th, 2011, 13:04
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
Catwalk: Weren't you in favour of the idea of putting pressure on random people to get reactions? I figured when you said you were half joking about your initial statement, the "joke" part was wanting to put them on 5 votes.
September 28th, 2011, 13:12
Posts: 821
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2011
Rowain Wrote:Seems to me we have different definitions of frantic
Hehe... we might have different takes on what we would consider "frantic" behavior by different individuals. With Catwalk, I did feel like there were times he got a bit frantic in the last game,and his behavior now doesn't seem like that.
September 28th, 2011, 14:01
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
Official Tally - Day 1 - 11 alive - 6 to lynch
3: Rowain (Catwalk, Novice, Injera)
3: Winston Hughes (Lewwyn, Uberfish, Rowain)
1: Lewwyn (Winston Hughes)
1: Novice (Serdoa)
1: Erebus (Sareln)
1: Sareln (Bobchillingworth)
1: Catwalk (Erebus)
All voting
If you know what I mean.
September 28th, 2011, 14:30
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
uberfish Wrote:Catwalk: Weren't you in favour of the idea of putting pressure on random people to get reactions? I figured when you said you were half joking about your initial statement, the "joke" part was wanting to put them on 5 votes. Yes, I do suggest we shift pressure around so we might learn something for later. And yes, I was joking about putting them on 5 votes right away. As I pointed out later, we might get small leads upon which we can each decide where our vote is best put. It's still just a mostly random guess, and I argued against using these tiny leads as anything substantial. That can blind us down the road. I'm quite happy with my vote on Rowain, and I'll be going to bed before too long. I'll check in again before then (in around an hour) to see if I want to revise my vote, I won't have any time to push my vote here and there to dig for more information. If others have time they should certainly go for it. Also helps keep the scum on their toes.
September 28th, 2011, 14:36
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
catwalk
I don't like that whole "making sense" from you. I have you seen as innocent now in two games - of course you could have learned but honestly it is one thing to learn stuff but a whole other thing to play like someone else.
September 28th, 2011, 14:54
Bobchillingworth
Unregistered
I think this day might go on for a long time Nobody is going to want to cast the last couple votes needed for a lynch unless there's a serious slip-up, which I seriously doubt we're going to see on the first day.
My vote isn't doing anything at the moment, so I'm switching to Winston Hughes on the incredibly thin grounds that he seems too cagey.
September 28th, 2011, 15:09
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
And bedtime came a little sooner than expected. I'm keeping my vote on Rowain. I find it hilarious that Serdoa is suspecting me because I make sense, btw Are you suspecting that a fellow scum is feeding me lines?
September 28th, 2011, 15:23
Posts: 821
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2011
Serdoa Wrote:I don't like that whole "making sense" from you.
His play does seem different but I don't think that's a great reason to vote for him, at least on Day 1. I mean, it basically puts him in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. If he plays erratically he gets votes on him, if he doesn't he gets votes. I think it's very plausible he took a lot of flak for a few odd plays last game and has changed.
Bobchillingworth Wrote:I think this day might go on for a long time
We can always implement our own "deadline" if we want if we get a majority of the players to go along. I don't think we should do that now, but if this Day 1 drags on into the weekend or something I'd be all for it.
|