As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer

Create an account  

 
[SPOILERS] Can't we all just get along? (lurker thread)

It's actually a completely reasonable strategy for Russia on the wrong end of a 2v1 to throw the entire SE of the board to Turkey, and then say to France: "I'll hold the north for a draw, but throw the game to Turkey if you so much as move one unit in a suspicious direction."
Reply

uberfish Wrote:It's actually a completely reasonable strategy for Russia on the wrong end of a 2v1 to throw the entire SE of the board to Turkey, and then say to France: "I'll hold the north for a draw, but throw the game to Turkey if you so much as move one unit in a suspicious direction."

Sure, but shouldn't he actually *say* that? Rather than making France guess what he means?
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker

Reply

Actually I really do think Russia's best strategy IS to not defend the south at all and give everything in the south to Turkey as quickly as possible. So that France has no time to eliminate England or kick him out of one of the scandinavian SC. It doesn't matter how many units Turkey has, he cannot progress beyond the stalemate line without help.

Blackmail is a completely legitimate way to get a draw in Diplomacy smile
Reply

Yeah, I agree that blackmail is legit, but I don't think Rowain's made it clear that scooter has an option, and scooter hasn't even tried to talk to Rowain about options. From Rowain's latest post it looks like Rowain made the assumption that scooter should have taken his public declaration of war as an invitation for negotiations, or a starting point for them, but scooter instead took that rowain had made his mind up to go after scooter and let Turkey win. So yeah, fail on both their parts. Going forward it'll be interesting to see if they can patch things up enough to prevent Turkey from a solo or if there's just too much bad blood now. At least they're talking again, even if it's angry notes back and forth.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

uberfish Wrote:Haha, called it exactly.

bah! this just rubs in the fact that i failed so miserably.

im not steaming nearly as bad as the loss in WW.
That *still* hurts to think about.

Thoughts on Diplo later - almost all caught up with all the threads!

Thanks for lurking guys.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Reply

waterbat Wrote:im not steaming nearly as bad as the loss in WW.
That *still* hurts to think about.

At least you weren't the one who gave the wolves their deep cover rolleye
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

ok! All caught up!

I'd like to put some thoughts down here - by the time this game ends, I'd be hard pressed to put much into a post.

These are my opinions as a minor adjunct to Bigger - he of course had the much weightier responsibility of making the moves. I could spout BS without having to pull any triggers.

Player relations:
Tasunke: Fail - obviously we'd have prefered GE over GF from the start.

Molach: Fail as well - I really wanted to take him up on his "for the lurkers! for the ratings!" diplo. I wanted to do it in a way that we defer stabbing scooter into the indefinite future. I guess that wouldnt have worked - it would have forced scooter to attack italy which he had made some agreements with. In any event - G+E at that point could have held against F - but it really wasnt clear how we were to make gains on the board in this situation. We'd have tons of units tied down on the F border. Again - it was short-term thinking. Longer term, with England's help - we may have been able to make slower gains against F and/or R and been in a great position.

Unfortunately, the path forward with F was so clear - we had tangible way to make solid gains by continuing with F .... as long as we didn't find ourselves with a very large dagger in our back. You know how that worked out.

Scooter: Great play on his part. Only annoyed at the 1+ hour of nice chat just before the stab. If he'd have been quiet, would we have been 1% more suspicious? no - we were blind to it - at least I was -- i was supposed to be the guy on the team looking out for that sort of thing ... so "FAIL" on my part.

Tatan: Well, we wanted him to survive as long as possible - as he was our buffer against RT and potentially I. Did any of those countries do us in? No- it was all our own doing with a little help from the dastardly (is that the opposite of "honorable") French.

Mattimeo: Not sure what we could have done better with turkey. The opportune time for us to pair with Turkey was when we were hitting Russia in Norway, but Turkey at the time was hooked to Russia for purposes of clearing the Balkans - it wasnt a good time for them.

Twinkletoes: He seemed to have negotiated on good terms with everyone. Again this is where the Tasunke fail comes into play. If EG+F, it would not have been hard to get I to dogpile in. He was basically crying out for something different than heading east. We couldn't offer it to him because we felt like we had to pair with F because of E's absence.

Rowain: My favorite line on Rowain comes from scooters recent rants:
scooter Wrote:he's not really in a position to be demanding
At least a couple of times, I review some short/strange outright demand and look at the board and think the same exact thing "he's not in position to be demanding" that.

His diplo style though was frustrating - I also felt several times (as scooter pointed out) that we were presented some "invented" reason for moves that played out the turn before. That invented reason usually involved some attached implication that we now owed Russia for said moves. We might be noobish, but we're not completely retarded <shrug>.

That being said, we made a huge error attacking him for minor gain given scooter's lurking duplicity. We didnt suspect this, obviously, and unfortunately, didn't secure our southern flank before opening a potential new one.

We could have done better with Russia, but hard to imagine a situation where russia and germany don't clash after a while.

Bigger/Waterbat: I should have been a better tactics guy. When it comes to tactics, I'm ok at pattern recognition - but this being my first game - had no pattern database to draw from. But the failure wasnt in tactics - it was in the diplomacy part - I just didn't bother to check for those kind of tactics each turn. Our course seemed set, our future dominance in hand!

I also kept thinking i wanted to build bombers and buy a bunch of research dice to try to get the heavy bomber upgrade.

other items:

Touching on the point of eventual clashes: Scooter talks about a FG 2-way win impossible. I didnt realize this was so. I think better analysis pre-game would have helped. I thought we had time - we'd grow to be powers together before having to battle each other if even at all. Lesson learned for sure!

Mattimeo's timing on his recent mistake move was so great.

Also - I dont think we were "leading on" Molach as mentioned in someone's thread. But it was one situation were having a teamate allowed us flexibility on diplo. For example, I could express interest in Molach's plans, but Bigger could easily distance himself them.
We never consciously worked together on this, but I thought of it a few times and was a little more liberal with my dealings with the other players (although there weren't many chances for that).

I'm very interested to see how this turns out. I don't think scooter had to justify that his going for a solo was "for the ratings!". It is the object of the game, is it not? This will be interesting how the FRT situation resolves- I am pulling now for E to make some kind of ridiculous comeback and get back into the thick of things.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Reply

How would you guys wrap up England?

Edit: Since I ninja-ed scooter on his contest I'm spoilering my answer in case others want to work it out without seeing my thoughts

I'm guessing scooter's original plan was to do

Iri sup edi -> lvp

And then take lon in the following year

But then he realized england can try to break out with lon sup wal -> eng in the spring and then england threatens french core centers that scooter can't hope to cover.

So i am thinking (and tell me if any of this is illegal because i have never played before tongue )

Spring:
edi -> lvp
nth sup iri -> eng

And no matter what molach does scooter is guaranteed to pick up a center this year.

If molach tries to push out in the spring with lon sup wal -> eng then all the fleets bounce in the spring and the army moves into lvp. If molach tries to hold lvp with wal -> lvp and holds in lon then scooter is guaranteed a center in the fall with edi -> lvp and nth sup eng -> lon

It'd be nice to have a way that gives a chance at 2 centers but i'm not sure how you can do that without risking an english ship running around french backlines.

Updated Thoughts
I still like edi -> lvp and nth S iri -> eng, but if molach figures that's what's coming his best reply would be wal -> lvp & lon -> yor in the spring. That would set up a guessing game in the fall where england could possibly still hold both remaining centers, not exactly what scooter has in mind.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

I thought it was pretty straight forward until I read T-hawk's post which made me really doubt a "simple" solution. In the end, I stuck with my initial gut moves and came up with the following:


S1909
France: F bal Holds
France: A den Holds
France: A edi -> yor
France: F iri Supports F nth -> eng
France: A kie Holds
France: F nth -> eng

England: F lon -> nth
England: F wal -> lon

F1909
France: F bal Holds
France: A den Holds
France: F eng -> bel
France: F iri -> lvp
France: A kie -> hol
France: A yor -> edi

England: F nth -> nwy
England: F lon -> nth (or holds)

W1909
France: build F BRE

S 1910
France: A den Holds
France: F bel Supports F bre -> eng
France: F lvp -> wal
France: A hol holds
France: A edi holds
France: F bre -> eng
France: A bal -> swe (if deemed necessary)

England: F nth -> lon
England: F nwy -> nth

-- chance that england abandons home cores and does something like:

England: F nwy -> swe (bounce if moved above)
England: F nth -> ska


F1910
France: A den Holds
France: F bel -> nth (to cut possible support)
France: F wal -> lon
France: A hol holds
France: A edi holds
France: F bre Supports F wal -> lon
France: F swe -> nwy (or holds in swe)

England: moves don't matter - can cover back in NWY


I don't believe this allows any guessing by England.

In fact, I made the English moves with the idea they could see the French moves in advance. Of course there are other English moves, but I believe this plan France has flexibility to deal with them - and most of those other moves allow France to turn a unit back toward the southern or western fronts.


Pros:
Gets the objectives:
- All english home cores converted in 2 years (at least 1 first year)
- a F build in BRE
- no cores at risk
- does not involve BUR unit

Cons:
- F BRE is needed for the year
- A units tied down in DEN and HOL for a couple turns (they hold - in KIE and DEN in S1908, so if England makes other moves, they can be redirected to western front)
- The English are not completely eliminated!
- doesn't take into account Rowain gifting STP to Molach smile


--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Reply

Last night I began toying with ...

edi -> lvp
nth C den -> lon
iri -> eng
bur -> gas
kie -> ruh

The last two are necessary to cover backlines should molach order wal S lon -> eng, but I can't imagine him doing that. He'd lose right away in that situation. So maybe you can get away with not moving into gas or ruh.

Now, you may be able to instead convey den into york and try to set up a situation where you've got a chance to kick him out of two centers in the fall. Dunno, I didn't give it too much thought.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply



Forum Jump: