WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[Qgqqqqq]

Post 518

This may well be the first in a series of posts defending myself. It will be a series because I am posting/reading off a outdated system with a character limit, which is the reason i (normally) dont post much, and the paticular reason for not explaining uberfish vote. I have also not read past post 518.

So point 1) this i cannot defend except to point out this is my second game, plus Ive had exams so couldnt post much.


3) you are misrepresenting the chain of events

[Catwalk]

I want to revisit Mattimeo a little bit, don't eat me just yet Lewwyn. What are the downsides to Mattimeo stating if he used a shot or not? If he has 3 shots and is townie, chances are good he will be gunned down before he manages to use them all. If the mob later tries to have him mislynched on grounds of him ought to have been killed, we get the benefit of another 2 shots. I don't think he declared any kind of limitation on protecting the same target twice either.

Are you having fun there novice? Impressive quote digging.

[Rowain]

@Qg No problem if it is a serie of posts. As long as they are consistent.

But for one of the next I would like to know how novice misrepresented the chain of events. Or how it looks for you.

[Qgqqqqq]

Sry hit limit

...AFAIR my first point was based on votes for catwalk after his original I wont behere/rp post, which I thought was an OTT reaction.
Then catwalk makes his "i have bunch of strategies" post which i found wierd, hence the vote. Later catwalk gives a decent explanation so i move off onto tasunke (cause of generally suspiciousness)

uber cause of stuff like 202 & the novice face off, which felt like he was trying to make noise by arguing rather then debating.
I dont see that as switching side

[Rowain]

My next question:
Whom would you lynch and why?

[Qgqqqqq]

sry hit limit

...sides as i only quoted because he articulated what iwas already thinking.

I dont feel i was protecting thestick, i was just stating the gods own truth - that i didnt find thestick guilty and tbh if not for GM confirmation i still wouldnt.
I geuss that makes y'all better then me but i can live with that.

Satesfied?? And it only took a hr


/Defence
Matt you do anything last nit jc
Despite all that il gonovice
Whyd zak say yay?
gtg will catch up post lynch etc l8r

[Catwalk]

Damn, that was painful to read I still find Q somewhat scummy, but newbie townie is a decent alternative explanation so I will unvote for now. I still need to wrap my head around zakalwe's accusations of Ichabod, he looks like a promising lynch candidate. Him being busy also matches the theory of an inexperienced/inactive wolf pack. I'm probably shooting myself in the foot with that argument as it can apply to me as well, but I will stand by it.

[Rowain]

@Qg once you return I would love to hear your suspects (and your own reasoning )

for now pindicator

[Qgqqqqq]

Read ing through...

the reason for the park on uber is not because of great suspicion but because i then went toa 2 3 hour exams.
The last bit about parking it there was more cause i was too lasy to type out [COLOR="Red"] no vote[/COLOR ], didnt have any insights/strong tells on main suspects

[uberfish]

the reason for the park on uber is not because of great suspicion but because i then went toa 2 3 hour exams.

Exams on a sunday, really?