September 19th, 2012, 16:34
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
no I think that IF he faked the post restriction he is likely a wolf. I think that is something that could be used as hard evidence. I think that a 1-shot post restrictor is less likely than a multi-shot post restrictor. I think that if someone else gets the same exact post restriction, it will either clear novice OR bring another wolf to the foreground.
So YES DAMNIT I think that the post restriction is IMPORTANT. and that its good to know, for sure, whether or not it was faked. (as that is AS GOOD AS guilt or innocence)
So yea, from the Sareln angle? No evidence of Novice's guilt. From the post restriction angle? Possibly.
September 19th, 2012, 16:34
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
Rowain Wrote:In WW14 I could hand out restrictions which lasted 1day+1night annd I had to use a different one each night.
you had to use a different one each night ... aw hell.
September 19th, 2012, 16:34
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
I'm inclined to believe Waterbat's claim, and I don't think he would have posted at all if he was scum. Noone was expecting him to post, the safe thing to do as scum was to simply check in later and offer the same excuse.
September 19th, 2012, 16:38
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
Anyways, perhaps it was unstated but I DO think that I have to step back and reassess. For me this doesn't mean that I'm gonna just believe that novice is villager, but on the same token, there is no reason to believe that Sareln or Uberfish are guilty, which also means, perhaps recursively, that there is not a whole lot to go on when it comes to Novice's "scumminess".
I mean hell, GASPAR is more scummy than Novice at the moment.
Given Rowain's reveal ... we might not even be able to get a lot of info from the post restriction thing ... even if it DID look a bit fishy.
September 19th, 2012, 16:38
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
Tasunke Wrote:no I think that IF he faked the post restriction he is likely a wolf. I think that is something that could be used as hard evidence. I think that a 1-shot post restrictor is less likely than a multi-shot post restrictor. I think that if someone else gets the same exact post restriction, it will either clear novice OR bring another wolf to the foreground.
So YES DAMNIT I think that the post restriction is IMPORTANT. and that its good to know, for sure, whether or not it was faked. (as that is AS GOOD AS guilt or innocence)
So if the wolves decide to not use the PR anymore (or maybe can't ) the can be sure that you would try to lynch novice? And if someone with the same restriction turns up you will claim that it is a second wolf faking it? Are you trying the waterbat-approach in playing scum?
September 19th, 2012, 16:40
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
It would actually be hilarious if a wolf fakes a post restriction tomorrow Scum, I dare you!
September 19th, 2012, 16:42
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
Rowain Wrote:So if the wolves decide to not use the PR anymore (or maybe can't ) the can be sure that you would try to lynch novice? And if someone with the same restriction turns up you will claim that it is a second wolf faking it?
... no, probably not.
you did make me laugh though, so props.
What I am saying is, I might never take Novice's "villagerishness" for granted. And at the same time, he is at the bottom of my potential suspects for now.
September 19th, 2012, 16:43
Posts: 821
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2011
Catwalk Wrote:I'm inclined to believe Waterbat's claim, and I don't think he would have posted at all if he was scum. Noone was expecting him to post, the safe thing to do as scum was to simply check in later and offer the same excuse.
You're missing the point. He didn't color his vote red, which ultimately would have swung the vote to pindicator. And he voted for the guy voting Ichabod who wouldn't be around to change his vote as mayor.
It requires an explanation. I mean, if you saw a lynch result and saw that the vote went against your preferred target because you screwed up your tags, and there was a dead village, you wouldn't react pretty strongly to that?
September 19th, 2012, 16:43
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
September 19th, 2012, 16:45
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
Ichabod Wrote:novice Wrote:So am I still scummy for trying to stop a Sareln lynch?
So the only reason you changed from me to Pindicator was to try and save Sareln?
Could you please answer me this, Novice?
|