Rowain, what's wrong with that argument by novice? It's plausible you would act that way if you're scum.
|
WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives
|
|
The game is about discussing accusations. If an idiot or a scum (or someone who just happens to be wrong) makes a bad accusation against you (from your perspective), overreacting is more likely to make the accusation stick. Notice that I said earlier you read villager to me, I'm not attacking you here.
@pindi. Inwas on uberfish As stated, didn't want a completely useless vote, so picked candidate who was gathering votes and I could see as wolf. I jumped back on the uberfish flash train ASAP.
@uber: Before the night kill, I went right back to this flash train. I was thinking it was a bunch of opportune voters, but it wasn't. It was the same people (Tt, azza, bigger, me) who started on über, joined by+ Serdoa and Tasunke. But I didnt suspect them because as uber has stated - wolves didn't need a reason to jump to save villager sareln. But now with the vote tally, I see it was 5-5 at the time. PIndicator also needed saving? So, if Serdoa doesn't die and flip village i suspect him and tasunke of possibly trying to save pindicator, but that's not really useful now that Serdoa is dead and we don't know pindicators status. I also didn't suspect the guys who did what I did ( jumping off über and then back on). That seemed hypocritical. But If you are innocent, it's possible there are scum there too. I have a different tinfoil theory about the flash wagon on you, but need to review the logs again.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Catwalk getting accused is not the problem. It are certain arguments which are completly strange (to use a nice word).
Voting for someone novice suspects (but doesn't vote for) has brought him to really switch off someone how often? Especially if his buddy zakalwe votes and accuses the very same target he votes for? Do you really think someone who has played so many games here with those 2 as I have, believes that could work? In short I agreed with Bigger beeing suspect, I did not agree with their read on thestick and I voted accordingly.
Just caught up.
OMFG thats awful, two dead and another with aworse PR then novice. Still back to da lynching, Im definitely happy to get behind a Selrahc lynch.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Heh. Tinfoil hat theory fails big time.
Thought was : pindi (wolf) against sareln(village). Wolves confer to start a wagon on one of their own (uberfish) to pull the likely voters who were on uberfish earlier in the day off of pindicator. The problem: I was the only early voter on pindicator. The early voters: TT - Mattimeo, Azza - catwalk Bigger - sareln Waterbat - pindicator No way this was a wolf move to save anyone.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Novice loses some town points for this, it seems to be stretching to find a reason to vote Rowain to me. Don't see why anyone would expect Novice to hop to a second scum read just because someone else voted them.
novice Wrote:It's not piggybacking but that's hardly the point. I'm voting thestick and express suspicion on Bigger. You immediately seize the chance to vote Bigger. It could read like an attempt to move me off thestick.
Rowain, I don't think that argument is bad, at least not bad enough to warrant head banging. novice states half a suspicion on someone, you post "Indeed" and put a vote on him with no additional reasoning. I don't see how D2 is relevant as we don't know the alignments of the other candidates. We do know that thestick was guilty and Bigger was innocent, that makes your vote a little more interesting. Not going to vote you on basis of this post alone, but it puzzles me why you're overreacting to it.
|
