pindicator Wrote:Rowain, what did you mean by Section A here?How about you read my posts?
|
WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives
|
Rowain Wrote:How about you read my posts? Don't be a dick about it Rowain, you aren't really helping yourself
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
Rowain Wrote:How about you read my posts? How about you pretend you're a helpful villager? I'm trying to but you aren't helping. Fine, I'll go dig through your damn posts. Again. Now answer the other half of my post, pretty please with sprinkles on top.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Cold be but I'm absolutly tired of repeating myself. he needs only to move abit back (from the post he quoted) and sees a post of me where he gets his explanation.
Went through the posts Injera made in the game. Lots of posts, very little content.
His day 1 play can be summarized as follows: a) Lots of defense on thestick, almost to the point of possibly being called too obvious. But what is very important to point out is that Injera's defense of thestick started early, in post 120. Novice and Zakalwe had already made their votes, so as Bigger and Waterbat. Thestick had 4 votes. It was an early defense, which seems more wolfish. His defense argument could have been made against Zakalwe, the first post attacking thestick, but he only made it when Novice and a beggining of a bandwagon were already there. He even made a preemptive defense of this "accusation" on night 1: Injera Wrote:A noisy night. I'm happy we caught a wolf, but obviously chastened. b) His battle with Gaspar. Interesting to notice that, while the battle began as Gaspar attacking Injera due to his defense of Catwalk opening post, when the day started passing, Injera started accusing Gaspar, not only defending, as can be seen in post 185. But all the attention he gave to gaspar disappeared as soon as day 2 started and Gaspar moved to other targets. He said that reevaluation was needed, so maybe that was it. c) The crux of what make Injera day 1 suspicious is post 150: Injera Wrote:Ichabod Wrote:His case in this post, as can be seen by his vote, was against Injera. He suspected Injera due to the Catwalk defense. So why add that little snippet about Catwalk finding time to play? The only explanation I can see for this is an attempt to herd the cats, to add strenght to his argument based on a thing that doesn't have to do with the argument itself, it's just indiciary. Why this is suspicious? Because Injera was the only player to find that post I made about Gaspar a good one. This post I made was the one that made mostly everyone vote against me. But it was not the case of Injera, he voted for me on a pretty flimsy reasoning: Injera Wrote:I'm not caught up, and it's going to take a while (16 pages). My reason for voting Ichabod is that we do have some similar behaviors in hunting scum. Particularly, we both focus on "little" tells in absence of larger ones when we don't have anything to work on, like I did early in the day with Gaspar. Crucially, though, he hasn't seemed to have graduated from the little tells to the big tells, when there's a whole lot of what I would consider "big" ideas going around. He never really explained what the "big ideas" were. Can you see why this is wrong? His vote on me is due to the fact that I didn't catch all the good lynches that could have been made. The lynches that he, apparently, caught. So, why wouldn't he vote for those people, why vote for me? It doesn't make any sense. This seems like a made up justification, due to the fact that just following the vote on me would be bad, since he actually liked my "totally scum post". The only problem here is his motivation? My first thought was that this would imply that Pindicator is also a wolf, but that's not a good guess. I think he just needed to change targets from Sareln, since Sareln was being defended by some key players to have been defending well, and if he participated on 2 mislynches, he'd look bad. d) He voted Bigger. Alone, this is not a lot, but it's also not a good thing to have made. --- Day 2, when he was not being attacked like in day 1 (attacks made by Gaspar), was way more contentless. It has a lot of small posts and questions. He voted for Sareln and after some people defended Sareln (like Gaspar), he changed his vote to me, with flimsy justification. Interesting to notice that he never said anything about me before that vote (other than something about Qgqqqq saying that there was enough attackers on me being strange). Anyway, my conclusion is that there's nothing in Injera play pointing to villager. I haven't seen one useful contribution, with my analysis in hindsight. I agreed with his early suspicions on gaspar, but he let go of them once Gaspar let go of him. So, while there's nothing too much damning pointing towards wolf, there's nothing good either. Could be a cautious wolf play and I'd expect that from Injera. Right now, Injera seems to be a good target for me, even better than Rowain. Arromir is still a good vote, though.
Okay, more Meiz translation (mainly for my own benefit).
Meiz Wrote:@catwalk #1357 Translation of the above: Quote:Catwalk Wrote:I would still like to hear your opinion on my earlier post:
I have to run.
Meiz Wrote:@Gaspar #1387 (Catwalk) Translation of the above: Meiz Wrote:Meiz agrees strongly with this paragraph by Gaspar:
I have to run.
Rowain Wrote:I learned that neither of them was more scummy than you. Maybe you can share your thoughts with the rest of the village if you don't want to share them with me? I'll look away, I promise, so you don't have to feel like I'm going to set you up with them. You get bad tunnel vision when you're pissed, you know that? Just like you did with me & jkaen in WW14. I found out where you hid your a) and b) categories, so thank you for your help there. It actually helps quite a bit
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player |



