|
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
|
WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives
|
Merovech Wrote:That didn't work out... I was hoping that since I was obviously pinging everyones scumdar I would just draw a night kill. I figured, hey, here's a role we haven't seen in a while, let's make it weaker. Guess that wasn't as clever as I thought. GG all. Hey it could be worse, you could have claimed a fake seer guilty on someone (I have actually seen this done.) Hope to see you back, just don't do that again 
novice Wrote:If Catwalk is a villager, scum don't care who hangs. So why draw attention to yourself by arguing against a claim that will be confirmed to be true when Mero flips? Because its one less worry at night? If you get the choice between killing two villagers of which one of them might be an issue with regards to nightkills later on, you take the more potentially troublesome. And if you are innocent novice, then you also throwing scepticism on the claim might give wolves enough cover to get away with arguing against it. They can say 'hey, great villager novice also thought so, so we all make mistakes' And we don't know that catwalk is innocent
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
Merovech Wrote:That didn't work out... I was hoping that since I was obviously pinging everyones scumdar I would just draw a night kill. I figured, hey, here's a role we haven't seen in a while, let's make it weaker. Guess that wasn't as clever as I thought. GG all. Thanks for playing, try another approach next time.  Btw, your post is probably overstepping what's allowed in a posthumous post, now we know you were in fact a lying villager and not something else. Rowain, how does that make you feel?
I have to run.
Merovech Wrote:That didn't work out... I was hoping that since I was obviously pinging everyones scumdar I would just draw a night kill. I figured, hey, here's a role we haven't seen in a while, let's make it weaker. Guess that wasn't as clever as I thought. GG all. don't post like that in death please. just good by and good night. dead people don't reason. but that being said - gg mero - u will be avenged. These mafia are about to learn of God's wrath and fury
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
oh sorry for multiple 1-liners, but http://www.cassidyweb.com/ww16 is updated to the deadline and Mero removed from future updates. I had to redo the update process due to the length of the thread - also had to break apart the posts into 2 pages per poster. Also kept bonking the post numbers, but i think i finally got it right.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla Twinkletoes89 Wrote:Because its one less worry at night? If you get the choice between killing two villagers of which one of them might be an issue with regards to nightkills later on, you take the more potentially troublesome. Ok, maybe you have a point. I do think though that the wolf instinct is to back off a claimer and nightkill them instead. I also think Catwalk is innocent (based on my reads, and btw how could catwalk be wolf with all the inactivity we saw today), and I therefore have a feeling that the late pushers (not the same as voters) on Mero are village. I realize we have no proof though.
I have to run.
While I don't want to ruin a perfectly good argument for my innocence, I would have been gone today whether I was wolf or villager. I did check in early on before leaving in order to contribute and let you all know I'd be gone, that's all I was able to do.
novice Wrote:Rowain, how does that make you feel? I'm not sure what you mean with this? If you mean the result : unhappy that it was a villager - double unhappy that he lied to the village about his role. Baffled by TT. But hell this was suicide with a running start oh and waterbat Wrote:welcome back azzaindeed |
