September 25th, 2012, 15:05
Posts: 821
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2011
novice Wrote:Wait so what was the test you proposed?
If he's a villager, Mattimeo protects me or himself based on a coinflip. This scares the wolves off from hitting either of us. At the start of the next day I can say what he did (either protecting someone or no result if he cloaked himself) and there's a 50% chance that I can confirm his power is legit, and he would confirm my power (or at least force me to make a coin flip guess.)
September 25th, 2012, 15:07
Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
1) You would not be able to confirm his power is legitimate, only that is called "cloaking"
2) He would not be able to confirm your power
3) Even if he could confirm your power, that does nothing whatsoever to prove you're innocent
September 25th, 2012, 15:07
Posts: 17,738
Threads: 82
Joined: Nov 2005
How do you distinguish between mattimeo cloackig him self and doing nothing?
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
September 25th, 2012, 15:07
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Injera Wrote:If he's a villager, Mattimeo protects me or himself based on a coinflip. This scares the wolves off from hitting either of us. At the start of the next day I can say what he did (either protecting someone or no result if he cloaked himself) and there's a 50% chance that I can confirm his power is legit, and he would confirm my power (or at least force me to make a coin flip guess.)
OK, yeah that makes sense. I constructed my own version that did not involve a coinflip. The coinflip makes perfect sense given your claimed role.
I sympathize with the need for resolution. But if so I'd rather lynch Mattimeo.
I have to run.
September 25th, 2012, 15:08
Posts: 4,138
Threads: 54
Joined: Dec 2009
novice Wrote:OK, yeah that makes sense. I constructed my own version that did not involve a coinflip. The coinflip makes perfect sense given your claimed role.
I sympathize with the need for resolution. But if so I'd rather lynch Mattimeo.
Why have you gone off Qgqqqqq?
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
September 25th, 2012, 15:09
Posts: 3,045
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
It's quite obvious that these tests would only proove abilities, not alignments...
@pind, Matt cloaking himself block actions. So Injera would get "failed" or "used ability" results
September 25th, 2012, 15:09
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
Meiz Wrote:Just wondering, the test Injera proposed doesn't work if he doesn't know who the person targeted. What made you think it would work that way, Injera?
It would not make much sense if we have villager tracker and villager tracker+
novice Wrote:Explain again what test you had in mind. I think we misunderstood based on our own assumptions of how your role worked.
I reread and Injera test works either way. Maybe we managed to get the unlikely scenario of two different kind of trackers.
Well, if Qgqqqq sees who was targeted, Injera could confirm it by being tracked and follwoing someone in a certain night. They could still be both wolves or Injera could be a wolf too.
...
September 25th, 2012, 15:10
Posts: 3,045
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
September 25th, 2012, 15:11
Posts: 3,045
Threads: 2
Joined: Aug 2006
Ichabod Wrote:Well, if Qgqqqq sees who was targeted, Injera could confirm it by being tracked and follwoing someone in a certain night. They could still be both wolves or Injera could be a wolf too.
At this point I'm going crazy 
September 25th, 2012, 15:12
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Twinkletoes89 Wrote:Why have you gone off Qgqqqqq?
He could very well be a tracker coupled with Injera as a follower. And Q has 10 votes right now, let's make it interesting. 
If we're going to lynch for information, why not Mattimeo?
I have to run.
|
