WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[pindicator]

Injera, why didnt you say yesterday that you targeted Azza? I just checked your posts so can you explain your thinking behnd choosing him? I assume you got nothing.

Btw- please dont assume someone injera targets is necessarily clean with a null result. If wolves can choose which one is doing the killing then he could have targeted a wolf that didnt do the kill

[Injera]

No result on Azza.

In response to waterbat asking "why Azza"?

Hehe, exactly. More specifically, he's hasn't really been reacting to the game as it unfolds- he was been on uber and Catwalk for essentially the entire game up until the moment Catwalk's neck was actually on the line. He switched to Mero at the last minute due to Mero's dodgy claim, which struck me as unusual for someone playing his first game here.

Not really trying too hard here pindicator.

[pindicator]

Sorry
I'm gonna blame that on being on the phone. No more "research" from me until i get home

[waterbat]

Hey waterbat, read those quotes again. I specifically said something about everyone in the list I gave except pindicator who I missed. The list is simply the people alive who didn't vote Mattimeo. And yes, it was rushed due to trying to squeeze it in during football games.

I wasnt being accusatory, really. Its just I had written a note to myself. "Jkaen - feeling villagery but absent, watch for an easy mislynch push on him day 6." The pindicator post put me on alert and then......... nothing. I know this doesnt seem like much to base a hunch on - but Jkaen as mafia would fit it.

Thanks for the long post above. I'm proud to be included on the most unhinged wagon in RB history Too bad Rowain isn't around to jump on - he was accused earlier (by mafia thestick). I had pointed out at the time that thestick might be trying to distance himself from Rowain. So much for that theory.

Selrahc Apparently, I'm going to try to vote for everyone at least once today.

[Selrahc]

Gaspar

I've been fairly ambivalent on Gaspar, I'd like to hear some more from him.

[Catwalk]

Let's be clear here, Catwalk, 2) is nonsense. Take a fucking inventory of the powers we've seen. So far, not counting me, the village has ONE active power -Qg. If you think I'm a wolf then I'm in the game to catch to catch him. The wolves also have a watcher to check out on whom he watches, and a 3-shot cloaker specifically to prevent him from catching anyone when they need to move. No, I'm a villager. The cloaker directly counters Qg and I and the watcher provides information for the wolves.

Do you expect people to listen more to what you're saying by using profanities? As far as meta arguments go, your argument hinges around us only having detected one villager power so far. So please ease up on the insults, and simply state your opinion. I even stated very clearly that I pulled back a little on my theory after my discussion with Meiz, and stated very clearly that meta arguments alone were not enough to really go after someone (unless we're without worthwhile leads). Personally, I think taking offense (over nothing) makes you look like scum trying to take outrage. Same with pindicator earlier for not wanting his votes questioned and starting to yell about it, and Azza getting pissy about being called out on lurking. This is a game about lying, you shouldn't take offense at others questioning your words and actions. If you think their theories are bad, politely poke holes in them.

And yadda yadda yadda, I know WW is all about letting out your internet troll. Gets old really fast (last sentences weren't aimed at the 3 of you, just WW in general).

[pindicator]

Same with pindicator earlier for not wanting his votes questioned and starting to yell about it

Catwalk, that's not correct. My frustration came out of answering the same question over and over and over, although I think once I got frustrated I started unfairly lumping in some people who had nuanced the question in a different manner or who brought up the old voting in light of new incidents.

[Catwalk]

I can understand frustration over having to repeat yourself, but that happens a lot too. Especially in a game this big. If you feel you've answered something already, np by me if you say you've answered that already. I know I felt that way a lot when I was being pummeled days 2 and 3, some questions were asked multiple times.

[Injera]

Fair enough about the language. Sorry about that. But if you believe my claim than saying the meta is ambivalent about my alignment is just not true. We've seen quite a few already and given that the game was supposed to be designed to have a number of vanilla villagers and wolves, and it's Day 6 already, I don't think we're going to see many more. So far, with the exception of Qg and I's role, all have been passive in nature. My role's only purpose as a wolf would be to hunt Qg.

Personally, I think taking offense (over nothing) makes you look like scum trying to take outrage.

Put yourself in my shoes. I have people suspecting me each night, and I quietly bite me tongue hoping that the wolves will find me scummy enough to live one more night to hopefully catch a break, and then wake up to a wagon with arguments like, "why haven't the wolves killed him yet?" "let's balance the votes", and "I believe his claim but the meta means precisely nothing."

[Injera]

Gaspar

I've been fairly ambivalent on Gaspar, I'd like to hear some more from him.

Anything more you'd like to add to the conversation?