WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

[zakalwe]

and guys im suiciding from the game.

Don't do that.

[Ryan]

I ended up getting told something from the lurker thread. and besides I broke several rules . Good luck everyone. I am sorry for breaking those rules.

[BRickAstley]

Ryan was modkilled for breaking numerous rules. He was a Loyal Mobster. He held no items.

[uberfish]

@Pind's whatever that post number was. I'm less suspicious of zakalwe's indecisiveness because I found myself indecisive at the end of day 2 so it could be a villager thing. Zak's "3 Ms" post is still bad but his defences today sound reasonable. Selrahc is currently worse in my opinion, for that attempt to throw suspicion on Ryan coming off a bunch of neutral meta posts.

Fake edit: Bleh @ modkill. Bigger's return PM to Ryan that Ryan quoted was also against the rules. Why aren't scum being punished for that?

[pindicator]

Dang it Ryan, we didn't need that.

@zak-
Well, i can see you chose a little of column A and a little of column B.

For one, i asked you to scum hunt and you respond by asking me my thoughts... Sorry buddy, not gonna do your job for you. My argument has been that you havent been working hard to find the badguys, remember? Have you dug through anybody's posts yet?

As for Lewwyn, if you're trying to insinuate we're scum buddies just come out and say it! Or can you not even make that much effort to appear like you're digging up dirt. Maybe if you wait long enough someone will do it for you and then you can piggy-back onto that. I may not like all his conclusions, but you can tell that he is at least putting effort and thought into his posts. I do also agree with him that you don't look like someone who is pro-town right now.

Now, selrahc is also suspicious, i'll grant you that. Do i give you a chance and join you on him? I just may. Depends if you can convince me you really believe it or if you're just throwing out another name again.

@uber- can you answer my question? Or do i have to accuse you of something to get your attention again?

[pindicator]

@Pind's whatever that post number was. I'm less suspicious of zakalwe's indecisiveness because I found myself indecisive at the end of day 2 so it could be a villager thing. Zak's "3 Ms" post is still bad but his defences today sound reasonable. Selrahc is currently worse in my opinion, for that attempt to throw suspicion on Ryan coming off a bunch of neutral meta posts.

Fake edit: Bleh @ modkill. Bigger's return PM to Ryan that Ryan quoted was also against the rules. Why aren't scum being punished for that?

Nice x-post. And thank you for responding

Agree that seltahc doesn't look good either

[BRickAstley]

Just to be clear, the modkill does not end the day, Day 3 will proceed as normal.

[BRickAstley]

Fake edit: Bleh @ modkill. Bigger's return PM to Ryan that Ryan quoted was also against the rules. Why aren't scum being punished for that?

The punishment has nothing to do with the PMs. After looking through the exchange, I was going to let Ryan off with a warning being a newcomer and not attempting further communication in PMs. He was modkilled for reading and posting in the lurker thread.

Now can we please lay this to rest and actually play the game?

[uberfish]

The punishment has nothing to do with the PMs. After looking through the exchange, I was going to let Ryan off with a warning being a newcomer and not attempting further communication in PMs. He was modkilled for reading and posting in the lurker thread.

Thanks for clarifying that Brick.

[zakalwe]

Dang it Ryan, we didn't need that.

@zak-
Well, i can see you chose a little of column A and a little of column B.

For one, i asked you to scum hunt and you respond by asking me my thoughts... Sorry buddy, not gonna do your job for you. My argument has been that you havent been working hard to find the badguys, remember? Have you dug through anybody's posts yet?

As for Lewwyn, if you're trying to insinuate we're scum buddies just come out and say it! Or can you not even make that much effort to appear like you're digging up dirt. Maybe if you wait long enough someone will do it for you and then you can piggy-back onto that. I may not like all his conclusions, but you can tell that he is at least putting effort and thought into his posts. I do also agree with him that you don't look like someone who is pro-town right now.

Now, selrahc is also suspicious, i'll grant you that. Do i give you a chance and join you on him? I just may. Depends if you can convince me you really believe it or if you're just throwing out another name again.

@uber- can you answer my question? Or do i have to accuse you of something to get your attention again?

Nice dodge, there. You won't do my job on Mattimeo, but you want me to do yours on Selrahc?

What was that about hypocrisy again?

I'll go first then. I think Mattimeo has been even worse than Selrahc today. He should have double voted on day 1, but he didn't. He tried to justify that, instead of explaining it. That's how I see it. And today, when a seer claim may well be around the corner, he has said literally nothing. The reason Selrahc may be the better lynch is that his first two days were anemic, and that he was on the block yesterday, so his alignment is of particular interest.

Now your turn.

Btw. I write many of my posts on my iPad, including this one. So no walls of quotes then. Which appears to be what you associate with "digging".