actually, withdrawing point 4 because Q himself also said somewhere it had nothing to do with ryan.
|
WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER
|
|
Well, I really have a hard time to actually motivate myself to write anything. That certainly has partly to do with everyone simply having checked out. You know that we are far from won, right? If our todays lynch is not the correct one, than we are at 4-1 and will go with 2-1 into the next day if Azza isn't shooting the scum (if he himself isn't it). So what then? Lynching Azza because he killed a villager in the night? Or lynching the other guy?
It really sucks that out of 6 players, 3 basically decided to not play. Azza, Q and Mattimeo are either not talking at all or in Mattimeos case are just not caring anymore. I can understand scum doing that, but at least 2 of you should be villagers. Anyhow, I have two questions: @Mattimeo Why did you pass the double-vote to Lewwyn despite it being basically 100% likely that he would die? Why not to me for example? @BRick Two rule-clarifications please: "Snitches (scum) - You win with the Snitches when you have eliminated all Mobsters, or established control of half or greater than half of the remaining votes. " If we start the day at 1-1 with me being alive and Mayor, would Mobsters win? Snitches would not have eliminiated all of us, nor would they control half or more of the remaining votes. (And of course I would vote for the other guy) 2nd rule question: Are we allowed to not vote? Not unvote, but really not vote, so that no lynch will happen? I know there was a rule enabling this in Tasunkes game, but I think in uberfishs game this is forbidden normally. How is it in this game?
I agree with everyone that Mattimeo's idea is bad logic. However, I think Mattimeo is silly enough to do it. So it's very possible that he's a villager. He might have given the arm to me because my Qgqqq and uberfish make it good for him if he's a wolf though. Now that he's answered my vote goes to uberfish as I agree with lewwyn's attack's against him that lewwyn's attacks against mattimeo.
Uberfish
Sorry guys I rarely don't have time/internet access atm, I'm not trying to bow out (tbh I was hoping id die by now).
I really do worry as to the direction a Matt lunch will take us, as scum will kill mjw in the night (+me if azza/mjw are scum) meaning well just be stuck between two candidates (uber/azza ). Ill try to be online at lynchtime.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
We get stuck between two candidates anyway tomorrow if we mislynch today. The doublevote may or may not matter, as serdoa has mayor anyway so the doublevote turning 2v1 into 2v2 makes no difference
I went over matt's posts and I just can't tell the difference between matt=lurking scum and matt=disengaged town at this point with a slight scum lean due to the voting antics yesterday and failure to use his power in a meaningful way on day 1 and 2. If anyone has a better read one way or the other, please speak up. Otherwise I will just vote him because I don't want the last day to be Mattimeo vs someone else. I've had that sort of endgame before and it sucks. And like MJW says, scum matt could have deliberately passed the doublevote to MJW because he didn't suspect him. MJW has been frustrating to deal with because he clearly wasn't paying attention yesterday. But I don't really get a feeling that he is scum, same for Q. TBH I really think Azza is the last scum, and today isn't really going to do anything, thus lack of motivation today.
Well, I would have some ideas, though I first need the answers to my rule-questions.
@uberfish I agree that Mattimeo giving up could either be scum or village. But I actually lean right now more towards scum because in WW18 he was village and despite them having decided to lynch me on the last day before I had written one word, he still engaged a little bit in discussion and tried at least to actually play for village. I don't see that here at all.
Official Lynch Vote Count
Mattimeo - 3 - uberfish, Qgqqqqq, Azza uberfish - 1 - MJW Players not voting: Mattimeo, Serdoa (January 16th, 2013, 14:04)Serdoa Wrote: @BRick Since you would be able to win a vote over the other person alive due to mayor status, yes. Quote:2nd rule question: Are we allowed to not vote? Not unvote, but really not vote, so that no lynch will happen? I know there was a rule enabling this in Tasunkes game, but I think in uberfishs game this is forbidden normally. How is it in this game? There isn't a no vote option. If you don't vote it will be similar to missing a vote. |
