WW24: The Ashes of Brigdarrow: VILLAGE WINS

[zakalwe]

Why do you have Ichabod (with no posts) on place 4.
Why would you rather lynch him (+Lewwyn, Serdoa) before Tasunke?

There's a method to the madness.

[Qgqqqqq]

To be honest you effectively claimed big fat liar.

I mean unless you can somehow park Monster trucks on canoes what's a parking attendant doing on the council of thirteen.

Hey now, don't make me write you a ticket.

The parking attendant claim was a joke. I'm guessing the miller claim is also a joke. We're just sprouting some nonsense to get people talking. (At least, that's what I'm doing.)

In terms of roleplay, I'm not feeling the "council of thirteen". So I reserve the right to substitute my own reality.

Its not a council, we're just locking you in a room and getting you to decide who you want to kill. It was a council before pindicater fingered you
/fake-universe within a fake-universe only designed for this game grumble

[Gazglum]

Why do you have Ichabod (with no posts) on place 4.
Why would you rather lynch him (+Lewwyn, Serdoa) before Tasunke?

AH Rowain, don't make me vote you for your lack of pattern recognition.

Zak, your avatar is my worst nightmares come to life. I love it.

[slowcheetah]

To be honest you effectively claimed big fat liar.

I mean unless you can somehow park Monster trucks on canoes what's a parking attendant doing on the council of thirteen.

Hey now, don't make me write you a ticket.

The parking attendant claim was a joke. I'm guessing the miller claim is also a joke. We're just sprouting some nonsense to get people talking. (At least, that's what I'm doing.)

In terms of roleplay, I'm not feeling the "council of thirteen". So I reserve the right to substitute my own reality.

Yeah I know they were jokes . Although I did misunderstand Azza's momentarily.

You did claim big fat liar though :P

but I got demoted for my habit of lying through my teeth.

[Rowain]

AH Rowain, don't make me vote you for your lack of pattern recognition.

Now that you mentioned it.

[Serdoa]

I can see zaks postings as jokes - though I really don't like them. Somehow my memories of zak joking in WW-games are rather bad ones. Also, if you are joking to get people talking, it might not make much sense to reveal the joke (no matter how obvious it was) already now. Not that I think this joke would really achieve much in that regard tbh, too blatant. And except for everyone to see that Rowain is a little slow today it really didn't yield anything. Lastly, I also don't like that "we are just sprouting some nonsense (at least that's what I am doing)" line. Mostly because I think Azzas "claim" was not just a joke. Though that even zak took it as such actually does strengthen my impression that it was more than just a joke. Lets see:

I'm the miller.

Azza

I really, really don't like this. We know that in this setup there is no miller so obviously it is a lie / joke. But his self-vote on top is imo just used to discourage anyone from voting him. He made a joke, he voted for himself, everyone who reads that will look somewhere else - and imo that is the sole purpose of this post. Make everyone look somewhere else, at least on D1, than onto Azza. Coupled with his normally very low post-count that would probably let him lurk quite some time. I wouldn't be surprised to see that even used as a defense later down the line as "as scum I would never do that"... I think Azza is exactly the player to do that:

Azza

[slowcheetah]

I really, really don't like this. We know that in this setup there is no miller so obviously it is a lie / joke. But his self-vote on top is imo just used to discourage anyone from voting him. He made a joke, he voted for himself, everyone who reads that will look somewhere else - and imo that is the sole purpose of this post. Make everyone look somewhere else, at least on D1, than onto Azza. Coupled with his normally very low post-count that would probably let him lurk quite some time. I wouldn't be surprised to see that even used as a defense later down the line as "as scum I would never do that"... I think Azza is exactly the player to do that:

Azza

I'm not sure that argument really works. Can you see anything obvious to talk about aside from Azza's miller claim at this point? In my opinion that post did make him a day 1 talking point.

[Serdoa]

I'm not sure that argument really works. Can you see anything obvious to talk about aside from Azza's miller claim at this point? In my opinion that post did make him a day 1 talking point.

Why do you think that argument does not work?
Why do you think that argument made him a day 1 talking point but want to talk about something else?

And no, I don't see anything - neither obvious nor not obvious (whats the right word for "not obvious"?) - to talk about because the only other mentionable thing was zaks posts which I did talk about already. Aside from that we just have joke-votes by a few players, some "random" posts that don't really have any meaning imo and that's it. Which is pretty clear at that point in the game and I am not even sure why you are asking. Tbh, I am not sure what the purpose of your whole post is. You don't explain what you don't like about my suspicion, you ask a question that gets contradicted by the following sentence AND that makes no sense at this point and all around I have to say you make no sense - except if I would assume that you got nervous and try to deflect from Azza before anything builds up. But honestly, not even I am so bold as to think I got two scum within the first 3.5 hours of the game...

[Lewwyn]

Long day for me today.

People that jump out to me are Zak and Azza. Zak makes a ranking of voters, and something about patterns and I'm just too tired to figure out whatever bullshit it is.

Azza claims miller than votes for self. If you are a villager then claiming is good, but then you vote for yourself which is anti-town. Makes more sense as scum to try to create more confusion by claiming it and then voting for self. In any case, I think Azza's play is anti town. So Azza.

[slowcheetah]

I'm not sure that argument really works. Can you see anything obvious to talk about aside from Azza's miller claim at this point? In my opinion that post did make him a day 1 talking point.

Why do you think that argument does not work?
Why do you think that argument made him a day 1 talking point but want to talk about something else?

And no, I don't see anything - neither obvious nor not obvious (whats the right word for "not obvious"?) - to talk about because the only other mentionable thing was zaks posts which I did talk about already. Aside from that we just have joke-votes by a few players, some "random" posts that don't really have any meaning imo and that's it. Which is pretty clear at that point in the game and I am not even sure why you are asking. Tbh, I am not sure what the purpose of your whole post is. You don't explain what you don't like about my suspicion, you ask a question that gets contradicted by the following sentence AND that makes no sense at this point and all around I have to say you make no sense - except if I would assume that you got nervous and try to deflect from Azza before anything builds up. But honestly, not even I am so bold as to think I got two scum within the first 3.5 hours of the game...

The argument doesn't work because you've stated Azzas post will deflect attention away from him and thus allow him to skate by on day one.
I disagree because I think Azzas post and the timing of it has made him the likeliest day one talking point.

I replied to your post because it was the first one posted so far with actual arguments (and one I disagreed with), coupled to the fact I'm not actually sure how to respond to Azzas post beyond "Why?".

I thought my thinking was clear in my initial post, evidently I was mistaken.

A word for not obvious is subtle