Posts: 4,090
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008
I didn't get the impression that they were angry or irritated at us specifically for getting the gems site - I think it's more that they saw the spot earlier and realised they failed to race for it.
Much like I view CivPlayers city of Xochicalco (blocking off a nice spot in the southwest for us) - they simply pushed into that area earlier than us.
I think that speaks pretty well for WPC, in that they put the onus on the outcome on their decisions, instead of blaming us. That said, I certainly support a gems-for-dyes trade with WPC. Heck, we can even throw in another low-value happy resource to tie them closer to us.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
June 5th, 2013, 04:57
(This post was last modified: June 5th, 2013, 05:16 by kjn.)
Posts: 4,090
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008
Our open borders with CivPlayers has just been cancelled. Did anyone here touch the diplo interface, or was it on their end? We haven't received any notice from them via regular channels.
ETA: picture
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
June 5th, 2013, 08:50
(This post was last modified: June 5th, 2013, 08:51 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,311
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I didn't do it. I see OT4E on chat, I'll poke him and ask about it.
edit: he says they did it, I'll post the chat here when it's done.
Posts: 1,285
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2009
I will remind WPC of the fact that city was a barb city when we offer them gems.
Kalin
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
(June 5th, 2013, 08:56)kalin Wrote: I will remind WPC of the fact that city was a barb city when we offer them gems.
I think they know this. No need to mention it.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
Posts: 1,285
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2009
(June 5th, 2013, 09:00)Old Harry Wrote: (June 5th, 2013, 08:56)kalin Wrote: I will remind WPC of the fact that city was a barb city when we offer them gems.
I think they know this. No need to mention it.
What makes you think they do?
Kalin
Posts: 4,090
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008
Doesn't even matter that it was a former barb city. They were tardy in expanding to that area, and thus we claimed the area. Just as CFC was tardy in claiming the Starfall spot.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
(June 5th, 2013, 09:04)kalin Wrote: What makes you think they do?
Kalin
Re-reading perhaps they don't (grabbing could mean settling as well as conquering I guess). Either way I wouldn't try to justify it - they said themselves that it was down to their war, so giving an excuse makes it sound like we think we did something wrong.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
Posts: 1,285
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2009
(June 5th, 2013, 09:20)Old Harry Wrote: Re-reading perhaps they don't (grabbing could mean settling as well as conquering I guess). Either way I wouldn't try to justify it - they said themselves that it was down to their war, so giving an excuse makes it sound like we think we did something wrong.
That's a good argument and I agree. It's probably best to say nothing.
Kalin
Posts: 4,443
Threads: 45
Joined: Nov 2009
No need to rehash the barb city thing, just offer them the gems trade.
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!
"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."
“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
|
