WPC poll two

[Mardoc]

I think we have a consensus. But it's not super clear - we did have a lot of votes for 'wait for response' in the last poll. And my fellow 'give them something' voters don't seem to be convinced they've lost.

So, now that we've gotten a response, let's go ahead and put the question to rest, one way or another.

[kjn]

Note that my help them conquer cities is subordinate to eliminating the German team as quickly as possible - if they have no units that can take the city when we are in a position to do so, we either take it or raze it.

[Brian Shanahan]

Voted letter of the agreement, for the following:
1 They were unable to fill their side of the bargain, i.e. capture cities in a timely manner

2 The only way they'll hurt us is by getting et prior to a dogpile, and that happens regardless of us being generous.

3 The land will be far more useful in Egyptian hands than in Native American ones.

[pindicator]

Pretty simple why we take the cities. CivPlayers and Apolyton are 10t away from possibly invading. We cannot drag this on; we need to move our army into position to defend from the west. We could raze the cities but I don't see WPC as being happy with that based on their diplo. And if that won't make them happy then why waste the cities?

[antisocialmunky]

Well I hope the same people who hated on CFC for following the letter of the agreement us can please shut the hell up about moral high ground in the future when we propose to do something ruthless.

[Azza]

I favour letting them capture what they can, razing the rest and letting them resettle.