Posts: 179
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 05:55)Old Tom Wrote: No one said out of the 2 candidates, one must be scum. You were a better lynch. That much is certain.
Yet all three of you are cursing us for not lynching Muriel, clearly indicating that you thought out of the two candidates there were 1 wolf and 1 villager. If you thought there were 2 villagers, why are you guys so mad? We killed a villager with apparently an anti-village ability, and we saved the villager who actually has a lot of content and tries to catch wolves. So I don't quite understand what's there to be angry about if you believe both were villagers. All this anger ("You fucking idiots!" "Fools!" "What the hell?") are a tool to reach the villagers emotional side, make them feel like I played them so they miss-lynch me tomorrow. It's a powerful tool, look how fast the emotion of feeling betrayed made Saul switch his vote from Mary to Muriel, even though all the facts of the earlier argument on Mary were still valid.
And even if there are people here who truly believe that I'm some master wolf putting myself at risk at every opportunity just to gain village credit, consider the fact that there are more than one wolf in the game. Even if you believe I'm a wolf, it's better to not spend tomorrow just on Muriel, but instead look for the other wolves and not allow them to fly under the radar.
Posts: 106
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 06:08)Muriel The Slow Wrote: All this anger ("You fucking idiots!" "Fools!" "What the hell?") are a tool to reach the villagers emotional side, make them feel like I played them so they miss-lynch me tomorrow. It's a powerful tool, look how fast the emotion of feeling betrayed made Saul switch his vote from Mary to Muriel, even though all the facts of the earlier argument on Mary were still valid.
Aren't you exaggerating a bit? I doubt that all 3 you mention are wolves.
(July 22nd, 2013, 06:08)Muriel The Slow Wrote: And even if there are people here who truly believe that I'm some master wolf putting myself at risk at every opportunity just to gain village credit, consider the fact that there are more than one wolf in the game. Even if you believe I'm a wolf, it's better to not spend tomorrow just on Muriel, but instead look for the other wolves and not allow them to fly under the radar.
Agree with that.
BTW I just realised that we do have a double-voter:
(July 21st, 2013, 16:08)The Narrator Wrote: Final vote count:
11- Friar Andrew: Scarlet John, Bert the Bard, Know-Nothing Jon, Lady Elizabeth, Widow Edith, Agnes the Orphan, Half-Nose Harry, Muriel the Slow, Fat Rose, Short Richard
Posts: 76
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 05:55)Old Tom Wrote: No one said out of the 2 candidates, one must be scum. You were a better lynch. That much is certain.
Why? What made her a better lynch than Andrew?
Not that I expect an answer from you, still waiting on what made my first post D1 scummy. Something you also haven't provided, so most likely nothing to come here as well. Oh well, hopefully tomorrow village will listen to me and lynch you.
Posts: 179
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 08:13)Widow Edith Wrote: (July 22nd, 2013, 06:08)Muriel The Slow Wrote: All this anger ("You fucking idiots!" "Fools!" "What the hell?") are a tool to reach the villagers emotional side, make them feel like I played them so they miss-lynch me tomorrow. It's a powerful tool, look how fast the emotion of feeling betrayed made Saul switch his vote from Mary to Muriel, even though all the facts of the earlier argument on Mary were still valid.
Aren't you exaggerating a bit? I doubt that all 3 you mention are wolves.
Yeah that seems a bit unlikely doesn't it? Anyway, whatever arguments we can come up with, no-one is ever 100% a wolf or 100% a villager. Only a role like a seer or a mason can confirm someone 100%, and even then they could be a fool or a pretender. That's the fun of the game, I suppose, you never know for sure. So no, I am not saying that all three of them are wolves, but I am putting them higher in my lynch list for those comments.
Posts: 75
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 06:08)Muriel The Slow Wrote: (July 22nd, 2013, 05:55)Old Tom Wrote: No one said out of the 2 candidates, one must be scum. You were a better lynch. That much is certain.
Yet all three of you are cursing us for not lynching Muriel, clearly indicating that you thought out of the two candidates there were 1 wolf and 1 villager. If you thought there were 2 villagers, why are you guys so mad? We killed a villager with apparently an anti-village ability, and we saved the villager who actually has a lot of content and tries to catch wolves. So I don't quite understand what's there to be angry about if you believe both were villagers. All this anger ("You fucking idiots!" "Fools!" "What the hell?") are a tool to reach the villagers emotional side, make them feel like I played them so they miss-lynch me tomorrow. It's a powerful tool, look how fast the emotion of feeling betrayed made Saul switch his vote from Mary to Muriel, even though all the facts of the earlier argument on Mary were still valid.
And even if there are people here who truly believe that I'm some master wolf putting myself at risk at every opportunity just to gain village credit, consider the fact that there are more than one wolf in the game. Even if you believe I'm a wolf, it's better to not spend tomorrow just on Muriel, but instead look for the other wolves and not allow them to fly under the radar.
null tell friar vs scummy muriel. doesnt take genius to make right lynch there,
Posts: 106
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 08:42)Sir Percival Wrote: null tell friar vs scummy muriel. doesnt take genius to make right lynch there,
Sir Percival with all respect but why do you think that Muriel is scummy? All I see is your pushing that she used meta to clear Lady Elizabeth. And since then you have seen anything she did through wolf-glasses. Any cases she put forward were "the easy cases pushed by desperate scum", any argument she brought forward were disregarded. IMO you were very unfair towards her and not the pillar of justice you claim to be.
Posts: 114
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 03:05)Bert The Bard Wrote: I don't know if my justification makes sense but the bottom line is I didn't feel like it...
Ok, thanks.
Young Will, why were you watching me and Rob so intently?
Posts: 114
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 114
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 21st, 2013, 22:26)Kate The Waif Wrote: That being said, my earlier case against you pales against how incredibl scummy Muriel appears right now.
This is also a somewhat curious statement. What's changed since you were last online that made Muriel so much more scummy?
Posts: 75
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 22nd, 2013, 09:03)Widow Edith Wrote: (July 22nd, 2013, 08:42)Sir Percival Wrote: null tell friar vs scummy muriel. doesnt take genius to make right lynch there,
Sir Percival with all respect but why do you think that Muriel is scummy? All I see is your pushing that she used meta to clear Lady Elizabeth. And since then you have seen anything she did through wolf-glasses. Any cases she put forward were "the easy cases pushed by desperate scum", any argument she brought forward were disregarded. IMO you were very unfair towards her and not the pillar of justice you claim to be.
wat do u honestly believe muriel has brought to the table? coz it looks like gluttony of meta crap, and two poor cases misrepresenting two easier lynches.
the prevailing theme of not lynch muriel was she had somehow contributed more. i not see it.
|
