Posts: 106
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
It is nice how you change the points as soon as you feel uncomfortable about questions. (As you do now with bringing the Rob, Sir Percival and Saul into it)
You still have not answered
(July 29th, 2013, 09:23)Widow Edith Wrote: (July 29th, 2013, 09:20)Muriel The Slow Wrote: (July 29th, 2013, 09:07)Widow Edith Wrote: @Will
As you are one the wolves will have to kill rather sooner than later use it. (at your discretion of course and without telling when and where).
More once the night ended.
What's the point? Bert flipped a villager, we can trust his word about Will's ability. Every one of us should already know that if Will visits us at night, the GM will send us a PM that says Will is a villager. I really don't understand how some of you keep coming up with strategies to be used with these ability when clearly there's nothing to be done with it anymore, and also no reason to hide it.
Why are you posting this?
You talk at length about your smartness and Will's role fully known and how me asking you this make me look scummy but you avoid answering this very question. I repeat myself
(July 29th, 2013, 10:08)Widow Edith Wrote: If you are a villager (as you claim) and believe that I laid a trap for the wolves why did you post what you did? Tell me what is the sign of villagerness in that.
Posts: 106
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 13:22)Doctor Saul Wrote: I don't think you understand Muriel. Lynching me would be bad. You don't want that.
That is an interesting statement.
Posts: 226
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 13:29)Widow Edith Wrote: (July 29th, 2013, 13:22)Doctor Saul Wrote: I don't think you understand Muriel. Lynching me would be bad. You don't want that.
That is an interesting statement.
Why is that interesting? I am seer. Village does not want to lynch me. Isn't that normal?
Posts: 226
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
I also worry about Fat Rose. She was very quiet after pushing Sister Mary and now only attacks the easy target Muriel
Posts: 179
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 13:27)Widow Edith Wrote: (As you do now with bringing the Rob, Sir Percival and Saul into it)
Edith I'm sure you would be quite happy about spending the next two days and three hours only discussing Muriel.
Posts: 46
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 13:07)Muriel The Slow Wrote: Because I'm not a fucking idiot. Yes, you are right, I didn't know 100% that he is the friendly neighbor. But I knew 99% sure that he is it. To me, the obvious answer is the correct answer. This extends to the entirety of this game. A ton of people here seem to think that people doing villagery things must be wolves trying to get villager credit. Villagers sticking their necks out for the good of the village must be wolves taking unnecessary risks to get villager credit. Works the other way around too, when people act obviously scummy like Rob or Percival, for some reason a lot of you think that they can't be scum because it's too obvious. Same thing with the whole fool/wolf debate. If Saul was a fool, we would have gotten extremely unlucky. The odds of him being a fool are much lower than the odds of him being a wolf, and that's why I think he is a wolf. If I wasn't such a competitive person I would tell you to just fucking lynch me so my point is proven. But I want to win this thing.
I get all that. But:
1) why in the world would you point out what my role is? I figured some people did, was just hoping the wolves didn't. now you've made damn sure they get that information. it seems to me you are desperate to find another candidate, not to find a *guilty* candidate.
2) the odds are higher that Saul is a fool than a wolf. The odds that saul is a wolf and you aren't are astronomically small. What you are proposing makes no sense. why would he stick his neck out and invent a seer role in order to get one villager (Kate) lynched over another (you). that would only make sense if you and Saul both were wolves.
In both scenarios (saul is a fool, or saul is a wolf) it only makes sense that you are a wolf, so better to lynch the sure thing first.
Posts: 106
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 13:41)Muriel The Slow Wrote: (July 29th, 2013, 13:27)Widow Edith Wrote: (As you do now with bringing the Rob, Sir Percival and Saul into it)
Edith I'm sure you would be quite happy about spending the next two days and three hours only discussing Muriel.
No there are some more to discuss. But so far you have been the main-theme of most of the days. So far you have managed to get villagers lynched instead of you. Yes they were targets, yes they did look scummier than you or had more going for them to be lynched but still they were villagers.
And you still avoid to answer my question
Posts: 106
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 13:31)Doctor Saul Wrote: (July 29th, 2013, 13:29)Widow Edith Wrote: (July 29th, 2013, 13:22)Doctor Saul Wrote: I don't think you understand Muriel. Lynching me would be bad. You don't want that.
That is an interesting statement.
Why is that interesting? I am seer. Village does not want to lynch me. Isn't that normal?
The wording seems so odd to me. So as if you try to communicate a different meaning here. You don't say: "Hey I'm a villager don't lynch me". Doesn't make you scum I just find the wording odd.
Posts: 226
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
No, i think you read that bad. Maybe intentionally?
Posts: 48
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
(July 29th, 2013, 14:45)Doctor Saul Wrote: No, i think you read that bad. Maybe intentionally?
No, I agree with Edith. That statement came of sounding very off to me as well.
|
