September 22nd, 2013, 03:11
Posts: 1,574
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2013
so if you were whipping an archer/axe/something low cost, and you put a chop into it on the same turn as whipping it, you would lose hammers.
The best way to avoid this - apart from timing your chops? Would it be to switch to another unit for the chop turn then switch back to complete the whipped unit later?
mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
September 22nd, 2013, 03:20
Posts: 6,893
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2009
(September 22nd, 2013, 03:11)Dhalphir Wrote: so if you were whipping an archer/axe/something low cost, and you put a chop into it on the same turn as whipping it, you would lose hammers.
The best way to avoid this - apart from timing your chops? Would it be to switch to another unit for the chop turn then switch back to complete the whipped unit later?
This naturally depends on the situation. Sometimes you desparately need 2 units in 2 turns and just eat the few lost hammers. However if you can you should obvivously try to avoid losing hammers and delaying chop or changing production are both potential alternatives.
September 22nd, 2013, 06:30
(This post was last modified: September 22nd, 2013, 06:32 by WilliamLP.)
Posts: 3,199
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2010
(September 22nd, 2013, 03:11)Dhalphir Wrote: so if you were whipping an archer/axe/something low cost, and you put a chop into it on the same turn as whipping it, you would lose hammers.
The best way to avoid this - apart from timing your chops? Would it be to switch to another unit for the chop turn then switch back to complete the whipped unit later?
Why are you whip / chopping to put more than 70 hammers into an axe in a single turn? I'd try to plan my micro better. E.g. the worker chopping should have been doing something else first or the whip should be earlier or later.
September 22nd, 2013, 06:38
(This post was last modified: September 22nd, 2013, 06:38 by Dhalphir.)
Posts: 1,574
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2013
yeah that was the intent of the question - timing chops that way is obviously bad micro, my question was mainly to figure out the degree to which it might hurt me, since it happened by accident in an SP game today and I didn't record the numbers before rolling over the turn to figure out if I lost hammers, but it did seem like I did.
mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
September 23rd, 2013, 08:56
Posts: 3,199
Threads: 11
Joined: Jan 2010
What are the exact conditions for when a 1 pop city doesn't get autorazed?
September 23rd, 2013, 08:59
Posts: 6,893
Threads: 42
Joined: Oct 2009
(September 23rd, 2013, 08:56)WilliamLP Wrote: What are the exact conditions for when a 1 pop city doesn't get autorazed?
If it has been size 2, at some point.
September 23rd, 2013, 18:59
(This post was last modified: September 23rd, 2013, 18:59 by darrelljs.)
Posts: 8,762
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Or its popped its borders.
Edit: At least that's what I recall .
Darrell
September 23rd, 2013, 19:00
Posts: 8,762
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
(September 22nd, 2013, 02:19)plako Wrote: Overflow hammers above the value of the produced unit/building will go to trash bin. There are some excpetions, but this is valid in most cases.
I did not realized there were exceptions, can you elaborate?
Darrell
September 23rd, 2013, 19:21
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2009
(September 23rd, 2013, 18:59)darrelljs Wrote: Or its popped its borders.
Edit: At least that's what I recall .
Darrell
This is a myth.
September 23rd, 2013, 19:48
Posts: 6,700
Threads: 131
Joined: Mar 2004
I seem to remember that was true for Civ 3, that a city with any border expansion would not autoraze.
|