WW 31 Game Thread PARANOIA

[novice]

Jowy, I've had less time for WW this time around. It should get more manageable as the number of players dwindles down a bit.

By the way I don't think Q has done much to redeem himself today, still he's somehow managed to slip away from everybody's attention. So I'm not so sure that my game so far has been below par.

For the record, the more I think of it the more I dislike Lewwyn's claim. Why would he breadcrumb a vigilante role in the first place? Chasing Azza's teammates first makes sense though.

[zakalwe]

If I need to swap back to Serdoa (or to anyone else) to save myself later I'm sure I'll be happy to subject myself to another three days of being called an idiot.

This didn't feel genuine to me. And I didn't see anyone call you an idiot. To answer your question from the same post, there are many potential scum roles stronger than strongman. Investigation immunity, extra kills, you name it. Role cops are common and pretty useful too.

My gut feeling at the moment is that Serdoa is third party or sitting on something he feels is a strong claim.

I think Novice will shine through as town if he is town, although I'm still waiting for it to happen. But I'm thinking we should be more patient. (Come to think of it, 3rd party is a possibility here, too.)

Previewing - so you're not claiming, Serdoa?

[Catwalk]

Same question for you novice, do you think scum was going after Qg on day 1?

[Mattimeo]

...and I don't like any of the current wagons enough to put a tiebreaker down on them, while needing to have left the house about 5 minutes ago with no prospect of being back before deadline.

I'm going to go [color#ff0101]Bobchillingworth[/color] again. A good number of his posts contain arguments that I fundamentally disagree with - and that's it's impossible to call him on due to the fact he *always* covers his back by looking at both sides. There's continual statements of facts or ideas that are just flat out *wrong*, several of which are explicitly mentioned in BRick's posts to start the thread. This continued duality of opinion seemed really odd, until I realised that it resulted in basically everyone coming away with the idea that they agreed with Bob, almost dismissing the aspects where he was just flat out incorrect for the points where he confirmed their view. Seems to be mostly working as a way to fly under the rader while ensuring the dissemination of false data.

[Mattimeo]

...that would be Bobchillingworth

[novice]

Same question for you novice, do you think scum was going after Qg on day 1?

Well like I just said Q could be scum. If he's town I would expect one or two scum to have voted for him, no more than that.

[Catwalk]

Why would there not be more scum on him if he were town? They lost a powerful scum role, would they bus him so freely?

[Serdoa]

@catwalk

I stated earlier that I don't think that Q was in any way set up by scum. Is it possible that scum was on him? Yes. Do I think he was deliberately set up by several scum or discussed in the scum-thread as "lets vote for him"? No.

@zak

I didn't think that claiming does anything to sway anyone. Anyhow: Rowain got the item because I know that he was not involved in the kills last night. I watched him.

[novice]

Why would there not be more scum on him if he were town? They lost a powerful scum role, would they bus him so freely?

Do you think scum would pile three votes in quick succession on Q? Sounds awfully risky. And an every other night strongman is not that powerful a role.

Mattimeo that's an interesting perspective on Bob. His first few posts on day one were pretty bad too I seem to recall. Nonetheless I find the persisting reluctance to vote among the top candidates very annoying, that goes for all of you lone crusaders out there.

[novice]

I didn't think that claiming does anything to sway anyone. Anyhow: Rowain got the item because I know that he was not involved in the kills last night. I watched him.

Watched him or tracked him?