August 24th, 2014, 18:11
(This post was last modified: August 29th, 2014, 17:09 by Commodore.)
Posts: 17,920
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
PBEM 62 order, civs, emails:
DazedRoyalty-Fredrick of Egypt -dazedroyalty
Pindicator - Hannibal of France - jwmoore5024
Commodore - Charlemagne of India - commodore.rb
Ichadoc -Isabella of England - mozarthspier
The Human Hydra -Victoria of China - calebburney
The rules:
* BtS, no mods
* speed Quick
* map - I prefer a more lush map, non-mirrored but reasonably balanced. For size I'd lean more towards cramped than roomy
* Scout start for everyone
* AI Diplo - no communication and no city gifting/trading
* huts off/random events off/vassals off/
* barbs on
* Elephants - banned
* no blockades
* Difficulty -noble
* No nukes
* No espionage missions. Spies/GSpy allowed to explore
* AP victory banned ... other AP resolutions banned (AP for hammers only)
August 24th, 2014, 20:06
(This post was last modified: August 24th, 2014, 20:07 by TheHumanHydra.)
Posts: 3,680
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2012
Hi. 
As a settings note I'd much prefer Quick. And to get it out of the way, my window will usually be ~5:30 - 11:00 EST and my email is caleb burney @ it that shall not be named.
August 24th, 2014, 20:31
(This post was last modified: August 24th, 2014, 21:01 by Commodore.)
Posts: 17,920
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
(August 24th, 2014, 20:06)TheHumanHydra Wrote: Hi.
As a settings note I'd much prefer Quick. And to get it out of the way, my window will usually be ~5:30 - 11:00 EST and my email is caleb burney @ it that shall not be named. Hey THH, agree on Quick Speed there. My windows are streaky but 1900-2200 EST is a good and solid one. 700-1000 works okay.
Posts: 3,680
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2012
Whoops, I should have indicated that the times given were PM, ie. 17:30 - 23:00.
Posts: 17,473
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
jwmoore5024 for me (and then the usual postfix)
My window is 1730 - 2200 PST, so I guess that makes it 2030 - 0100 EST
+1 for quick speed. Haven't done a MP game on that setting in a while
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Posts: 17,920
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
Cool. I guess that means one or two more interested?
RBmod or BtS? My vote is RBmod but BtS is fine with me. Although if we do BtS, I'd favor a different kind of leader pick scheme...how about the 51 method? (Someone rolls say 20 leader/civ combos, picks the closest 10, then players pick from that list in reverse turn order).
Posts: 2,585
Threads: 43
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 17,920
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
(August 25th, 2014, 09:22)dazedroyalty Wrote: I'd play. Welcome, Dazed!
August 25th, 2014, 10:49
(This post was last modified: August 25th, 2014, 11:06 by TheHumanHydra.)
Posts: 3,680
Threads: 23
Joined: Oct 2012
I'd prefer BtS. If we go RBmod I can make it work but there might be a delay of a couple days as I find opportunities to hijack the McDonald's wifi to download Windows BtS and the mod. 
Edit: I'm good with whatever pick method.
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
I'd be interested in playing. I understand if you rather have someone more reliable, though. Seriously, feel free to speak up, I will take no offense if you prefer that I don't play.
If you guys are okay with me playing, my window is 1600 - 1700 EST or 2000 - 2200 EST.
Email is mozarthspier at the usual place.
Regarding settings, I'm fine with everything.
|
