Chat transcript
Basically tossing around the idea of not warring with Exploit, but instead giving him a tech embargo. The problems with that, as sunrise pointed out, are #1, they never stick and #2, I'm the next to be embargoed
Quote:(11:16:40 AM) me: so do you think an attack on exploit on t190 is good?
(11:18:17 AM) sunrise089: ah, i see the new email
(11:18:35 AM) sunrise089: well, no, not really
(11:18:53 AM) sunrise089: I think no one should trade him another tech and then we atttack with rifles upgraded to mechanized infantry
(11:19:32 AM) me: do you think that we can do that?
(11:19:40 AM) sunrise089: but I dont think we can pull that off, so maybe an attack now will be good. But what are the chances we end up in a 4v7 if we do that, since Exploit will make the case for shady to then atack you
(11:24:52 AM) me: decent
(11:25:18 AM) me: coudl we use the in-game "stop trading with"
(11:25:24 AM) me: every 10t
(11:25:35 AM) me: to ensure that?
(11:27:20 AM) sunrise089: perhaps
(11:49:58 AM) sunrise089: so first, assuming we do want to attack, I think we have a fair chance of making an impact on Exploit 4v1
(11:50:12 AM) sunrise089: however the defender has obvious advantages, and we'll get collateraled as we know
(11:50:15 AM) me: the 4th being? broker?
(11:50:18 AM) sunrise089: yeah
(11:50:32 AM) me: up through lin lands?
(11:50:39 AM) me: or on the other side
(11:50:54 AM) me: http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/64/globeshot2.jpg
(11:50:59 AM) sunrise089: on t191, when my NAP ends, I could probably bring in 25 rifles, and maybe 15 supporting units, including some machine guns if RR gets completed in time
(11:53:01 AM) sunrise089: I think if we do attack, the odds are high of some sort of backstab and attack from the rear, since civs seam very susceptible to exploit's "bribes," as if 2 cities from Imhotep's land will make or break someone's game at this point
(11:53:14 AM) me: agreed
(11:53:20 AM) sunrise089: if we could ensure no such backstab, I think we can at least survive an attack
(11:53:38 AM) me: brb
(11:53:43 AM) sunrise089: ok
(12:00:18 PM) me: back
(12:00:23 PM) sunrise089: ok
(12:02:36 PM) sunrise089: ok, email sent
(12:02:45 PM) me: interesting reply from dreylin re: shady
(12:04:56 PM) me: would it be better to arrange things so that only you border me from that side?
(12:06:11 PM) sunrise089: you dont border the lins, do you?
(12:06:16 PM) sunrise089: just me and exploit?
(12:06:27 PM) me: correct
(12:06:30 PM) me: (and shady and imho)
(12:06:40 PM) me: http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/64/globeshot2.jpg
(12:07:23 PM) sunrise089: so what are we hoping to gain from this war?
(12:07:41 PM) me: well what i'd like to get is removal of exploit as a threat
(12:07:47 PM) me: w/o turning me into an uber threat
(12:07:47 PM) sunrise089: do you think we would have enough to eliminate exploit?
(12:07:55 PM) me: if we could truly get everyone else
(12:08:17 PM) sunrise089: yeah, that would be ideal...we could even agree to just "leave the land to the barbs" or something
(12:08:28 PM) me: that was broker's in tent i think
(12:08:29 PM) me: intent
(12:08:41 PM) me: like i said to dreylin
(12:08:45 PM) sunrise089: but assuming we can't, I think we could capture cities, but if exploit's empire is based on many weak cities I don't know if taking 4 cities knocks him out
(12:08:45 PM) me: i don't need any of it but that island city
(12:08:54 PM) me: right
(12:09:42 PM) sunrise089: now attacking may make him slave his pop down or whatnot...but 1) he isnt really researching that much, is he? and 2) I've already hurt my gold production a lot, so at best that's just a tie for me
(12:09:55 PM) sunrise089: so all in all i dont favor a war, i favor a tech embargo
(12:09:56 PM) me: he's researching decent
(12:09:59 PM) me: he's in caste/rep
(12:10:03 PM) me: /merc
(12:10:07 PM) me: 400bpt i think
(12:10:15 PM) me: yeah i cost more than you make now i think
(12:10:17 PM) me: 267 to -279
(12:10:37 PM) sunrise089: right...but i go back to bureau in 2 turns, so that will help
(12:10:43 PM) me: cool
(12:10:46 PM) me: rr still due in 4
(12:11:11 PM) me: so speaking of tech, it occurred to me that if we think broker is much less likely to jump hsip than dsp
(12:11:24 PM) me: that it would behoove us to make sure that broker or me take the most crucial military techs
(12:11:36 PM) sunrise089: that's true
(12:11:50 PM) me: i was thinking the next 3 techs would be ass. line, combustion and physics
(12:12:00 PM) me: seems like physics for dsp would be the best, but broker was wanting the g. sci
(12:12:04 PM) sunrise089: is the physics scientist out there?>
(12:12:07 PM) me: yes
(12:12:31 PM) me: but i would not really want dsp controlling infantry or destroyers
(12:12:41 PM) sunrise089: hmm
(12:13:02 PM) sunrise089: you may recall I did say that if the anti-exploit alliance fragmented I may just accept exploit's half-gold peace offer
(12:13:08 PM) me: on a related note, i could really use communism, not only for the great spy (bomb exploit)
(12:13:12 PM) me: but for state property
(12:13:22 PM) me: let me forward you the latest email from exploit
(12:13:35 PM) me: "bringing peace to imhotep"
(12:14:30 PM) me: also imhotep cut off broker's 72gpt
(12:15:28 PM) sunrise089: ok
(12:15:42 PM) sunrise089: well exploit's plan is probably to just remove our lead time to railroad, right?
(12:15:52 PM) sunrise089: once again not the most clever ploy
(12:16:43 PM) sunrise089: also, i dont undertand the last paragraph - why would we NOT want me in on the NAP? So it ties Incan troops down...but it ties them down from attacking Imhotep, right?
(12:17:09 PM) me: yeah i certainly wouldn't want to take it w/o including you
(12:17:27 PM) me: this does provide options for the lins and/or broker to attack?
(12:17:37 PM) sunrise089: but I don't even see why exploit made the offer? Like what reason would he see for you not wanting me to have the NAP?
(12:17:43 PM) me: i don't know
(12:17:48 PM) sunrise089: oh, so it isn't a 10-way NAP?
(12:18:06 PM) me: i think it would just be between exploit, shady, dsp, me (you), and DL/munro
(12:19:04 PM) sunrise089: well i think that is clearly subpar to a "global NAP until Imhotep is dead"
(12:19:30 PM) sunrise089: leaving 3 civs out makes it very suspicious...as in everyone goes and attacks imhotep except one person, and they attack me or broker or the lins
(12:19:52 PM) me: yeah could be
(12:19:53 PM) sunrise089: if the goal is to knock imho out "for the good of the game" people should commit to that entirely
(12:20:12 PM) me: well far be it from me to suggest that that isn't really exploit's goal
(12:22:43 PM) sunrise089: ok, well my official position is that the imhotep attack as currently formulated is dubious, and even revised provides an advantage to exploit
(12:23:14 PM) sunrise089: and my official position re: war with exploit is that it seems a bad idea to take the offensive
(12:23:20 PM) me: okay
(12:23:26 PM) me: so tech embargo?
(12:23:31 PM) sunrise089: if it can stick
(12:23:32 PM) me: and do you agree with physics for dsp?
(12:23:35 PM) sunrise089: i dont know the second best option
(12:23:45 PM) sunrise089: yes, physicsa for dsp is fine for me...i certainly dont need a scientist
(12:24:13 PM) me: meaning that we're going to attack exploit later on?
(12:24:23 PM) me: what advantages will we have then that we don't have now?
(12:24:26 PM) sunrise089: for me, the second best option is to try and accept exploit's peace option...re-reading it he was going to get 200 gold and then give 100 gold to the Lins, so maybe we would accept less gold...but I then have to contend with a Lin attack
(12:24:29 PM) me: we're still going to have the risk of shady / dsp
(12:24:56 PM) sunrise089: basically, tech moves so fast in this game, that I dont think the most powerful weapon is ever war
(12:25:34 PM) me: so then what?
(12:25:36 PM) sunrise089: i think teams should "attack" by self-sacrificing as much diplomatically as they would slaving and drafting and forgoing infrastructure in game
(12:25:49 PM) me: what do you mean
(12:25:54 PM) sunrise089: and just make someone self-research\
(12:26:14 PM) sunrise089: just saying that if we want to stop exploit from winning, and an embargo worked, it's never necessary to invade him
(12:26:26 PM) me: good point
(12:26:54 PM) sunrise089: conquest and domination and diplo victory arent happening, nor is curtural if there is an embargo, because tanks kill rifles pretty well and then raze Legendary cities
(12:27:05 PM) sunrise089: so the only option is space, and let him self-research all the space techs
(12:27:41 PM) sunrise089: so the real problem is that 1) embargoes do NOT stick, and 2) you're the next embargo target
(12:27:57 PM) me: right and right
(12:27:57 PM) me:
(12:28:14 PM) me: well one good thing is that we only really have 4 techers
(12:28:20 PM) sunrise089: now I'm diplomatically committed to trying to help you win, and that isn't changing, but i'd rather not leave my civ very vulnerable to do it...and I think going on the offensive does that
(12:28:21 PM) me: me, broker, exploit and dsp
(12:29:10 PM) sunrise089: remember when exploit proposed everyone else let you and he fight it out yourselves?
(12:29:22 PM) me: yes
(12:30:34 PM) sunrise089: nevermind, that plan doesnt really make sense
(12:30:51 PM) sunrise089: i guess what i'd like to see is some sort of neutrality agreement with shady+dsp+Byzantium
(12:31:00 PM) sunrise089: if there is a war, for them to remain neutral
(12:31:32 PM) me: what i meant by only 4 techers is that if we can get broker on board, then we at least have 2v2 techers
(12:31:39 PM) me: (i.e. right back to where we came from....)
(12:32:02 PM) sunrise089: yeah, but surely sunrise+regoarrarr+lins+broker will be outpaced, right?
(12:32:20 PM) sunrise089: due to 2 gold producers vs 5 if nothing else, no?
(12:32:24 PM) me: probably
(12:32:35 PM) me: we were getting outpaced before
(12:32:40 PM) me: which is what started this whole shakeup!
(12:34:25 PM) sunrise089: right - but as it has worked out, Sunrise089's first rule of pitboss games: "Alliances for the 'Greater Good' do not work out - civs always choose short term gain over long-term solidarity" is just being becoming closer to proven
(12:35:12 PM) me: coupled with regoarrarr's corollary (Alliteration!) - alliances that are proposed "for the greater good" are always proposed by the one power that stands to benefit the most
(12:35:52 PM) me: guess i'd be interested to hear what broker has to say about all this
(12:35:56 PM) me: gotta run to lunch
(12:35:57 PM) me: brb
Basically tossing around the idea of not warring with Exploit, but instead giving him a tech embargo. The problems with that, as sunrise pointed out, are #1, they never stick and #2, I'm the next to be embargoed