December 31st, 2014, 17:14
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
I vote that q is the tie breaker.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
December 31st, 2014, 17:26
Posts: 915
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2014
That'd be a fine vote if you were actually playing.
December 31st, 2014, 18:05
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
You aren't going to sway me with sweat talk.
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
December 31st, 2014, 18:06
Posts: 915
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2014
I have no idea what that is, lol.
December 31st, 2014, 18:17
(This post was last modified: December 31st, 2014, 18:18 by Old Harry.)
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
It's like sweet talk, but a bit less appealing. And won't be swaying my vote.
I'm interested to know what tie-breakers are possible for a four player game other than "guy who suggested game gets casting vote" or "lurkers chip in". What did you have in mind?
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
December 31st, 2014, 18:24
Posts: 6,722
Threads: 59
Joined: Apr 2004
One more piece of information I'll need to make a map: what version of EitB are you playing?
I won't need that info until everyone sends in picks; I have exactly zero so far.
December 31st, 2014, 18:49
Posts: 915
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2014
(December 31st, 2014, 18:17)Old Harry Wrote: It's like sweet talk, but a bit less appealing. And won't be swaying my vote.
I'm interested to know what tie-breakers are possible for a four player game other than "guy who suggested game gets casting vote" or "lurkers chip in". What did you have in mind?
You use a random number generator to decide the constested settings. Or you have an invested 3rd party tie break. I'm fine with the latter in this case and it has my vote.
Also dave. No picks until you state what the map and settings will be yourself. And also duplicate civs I'd rather be allowed because it's anticompetitive otherwise.
This is eitb 11.1
December 31st, 2014, 19:25
Posts: 8,784
Threads: 40
Joined: Aug 2012
Invested like a lurker? What if there's a tie on the tiebreaker vote?
Completed: RB Demogame - Gillette, PBEM46, Pitboss 13, Pitboss 18, Pitboss 30, Pitboss 31, Pitboss 38, Pitboss 42, Pitboss 46, Pitboss 52 (Pindicator's game), Pitboss 57
In progress: Rimworld
December 31st, 2014, 19:33
Posts: 915
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2014
Invested like a mapmaker for a game or a mutually agreed upon third party. Dave is fine and good for this game in my vote. There's no tir on a tie breaker. The third party only comes in when there is a tie.
We also need a forum.
December 31st, 2014, 22:29
Posts: 10,039
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
Err, whatever we do, don't get the mapmaker involved. It's important that all concerned view him as impartial.
Yeah, it's v11.1.
Kragroth, all of this is very premature, we don't even know whether or not Northstar would support your side. Until we hear from him otherwise, you can simply consider yourself outvoted. (And why would I not be tiebreaker? I really don't like to put my foot down, but the fact of the matter is if it does come to it, it is on some small level my game as the proposer, so I think I have enough right to break ties.)
I'll reiterate, duplicate civs will not be happening. Get used to it.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
|