|
WW 34--The Slugfest!
|
|
@BRick I don't see any laps in reasoning.
I explained how he triggered my scum-o-meter but not enough to be worth a vote or the labour to get him lynched. Once he survives till D3 we have more and maybe better data. Still this were not the reasons for your vote so it does still lokk like you are desperately trying to get me lynched no matter how many fabricated reasons you need. Very much the same sunrise and xenu tried to do in WW31 the one you hosted. (January 17th, 2015, 03:52)Goreripper Wrote: Rowain why Qgqqqqq? Not really disagreeing I like the Lewwyn argument for your ankle biting late wagon joiners. But of those Jabbz looks worst to me. Yes Jabbz looks bad. Especially if he had read past games and should therefor know my style and his reasoning is very much parroting of Adrien. On general I found that scum loves to use untruth/lies and misinterpretations of my words/actions to attack me. So Brick is one top candidate for this especially with is later excuses to keep his vote on me. Adrien I might excuse for beeing relativly new, Jabbz looks extremly fishy but Qgqqqqq votes because I don't want to lynch zak on D1 which is a thing I have said several times in the past for example in WW 33 (in which Qg also played) (May 26th, 2014, 16:14)Rowain Wrote: Honestly from a pure theoretical PoV lynching one of you/novice increases town chances greatly. But I like the lynch zak/novice on Day2 approach better So there is a clear untruth told by Qg as reason to vote me => Qgqqqqq is scum. (January 17th, 2015, 08:48)BRickAstley Wrote: Rowan, I've stated multi times that I've found what seems to be more than a simple slip in your reasoning, and I am waiting for you to answer to it. So far as I see it your refusal to answer is justification enough to keep my vote on you, which is independent of my previous misunderstood argument that I made.Could you summarize this more than simple slip for the rest of the class?
Thanks for the novicespeak translation, Goreripper.
(January 17th, 2015, 09:41)Jowy Wrote:(January 16th, 2015, 21:35)BRickAstley Wrote: Yeah me being over eager and having a bad post kinda describes some of my day one play pretty well Lewwyn. Any specific questions/comments? What, why and how? Bob, are you going to feign nonchalance through all of day one? Your only contribution so far is this: (January 16th, 2015, 13:03)Bobchillingworth Wrote: It's odd that Rowain is voting for me to "spare [me] [his] boring posts", and then acting like his vote is based on some deeply-held conviction, but it all strikes me less as scummy and more as obnoxious and unproductive. Perhaps he has some variation of a "lyncher" role.Which is all fine and well but smells a bit of not wanting to create any ripples.
I have to run.
Yeah, 8.5 hours left. Tally as of post 146:
3 votes: GoreRipper (Jowy, Bobchillingworth, zakalwe) 3 votes: Rowain (BRickAstley, AdrienIer, Qgqqqqq) 2 votes: Lewwyn (Jkaen, sunrise089) 2 votes: Brickastley (Lewwyn, Mattimeo) 2 votes: Qgqqqqq (Rowain, novice) 1 votes: Mattimeo (Goreripper) 1 votes: Goregripper (BaII) 1 votes: bold (Jabbz) 1 votes: Jowy (Gazglum) Voting history:
I have to run.
Well I'm not convinced Brick is obvtown, novice, but I don't think he's swinging today. I'm more suspicious of Jabbz out of the other Rowain voters, but I willing to vote Qgqqqqq and see what shakes out while I sleep. I'll try to be on before deadline. It's like 8am for me.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Okay Rowain, I'm trying to figure out what you're saying through your attacks, and I think what you're saying is that this statement:
(January 16th, 2015, 06:16)Rowain Wrote: ...but I have decided to prefer zak not getting lynched during the first 2 days. is not actually "I think he is scum i just don't want to vote him yet", but instead "He is somewhat scummy but i want more data before i try to lynch him"? If so then understand that your points are coming across as clear as mud, but at least that isn't a horrid line of reasoning in itself. I also have no personal vendetta against you, I've just always had a current one. First it was due to my false reasoning, then due to when I re-examined the case (the only really valid one to have an opinion on at the time), I found you to be more a guilty option due to your temperament. And then the statement about lynching that I am now begrudgingly accepting your reasoning for. I still don't really like how you've played but I'm willing to listen to the group saying this is your normal badgery self. No Lynch while I look at some of the other threads of discussion I haven't paid much attention to. |
|
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
