WW37- For Whom the Bell Trolls

[Mattimeo]

Fuck it. One in three chance of hitting their ability to break defences, right?
zakalwe

[zakalwe]

I don't think we're voting over the length of this day, only the length of future days.

[Shadeun]

I don't think we're voting over the length of this day, only the length of future days.

[Rowain]

@Mattimeo

I'm sorry but voting to lynch me with help from commies would never ever been the right choice for you if you only have 3 votes. That is the illogical move from you.

@zak it is still changing the rules during the game. There is none "Gameday length might change whenever it benefits a certain party"-rule in the setup. In this case it has to be "all players have to agree" and not "someone can push it through".

[Shadeun]

@zak it is still changing the rules during the game. There is none "Gameday length might change whenever it benefits a certain party"-rule in the setup. In this case it has to be "all players have to agree" and not "someone can push it through".

That's not technically correct.

My third ability (which I reveal now) is: "Ring the Bell": Bring the days voting to an end 5 minutes early.

I agree that one man shouldn't have all this power, so I wont be using this ability.

[Mattimeo]

I'm sorry but voting to lynch me with help from commies would never ever been the right choice for you if you only have 3 votes. That is the illogical move from you.

If we assume the lack of night kills is going to continue (and given three straight nights completely lacking any deaths, you really can't say that's a poor assumption), it gives 4-2-3 tomorrow, and you *must* side with us against the Communists or you lose.

You know, exactly the same reasoning behind voting for any Anarchist, from a Fascist point of view.

[zakalwe]

The reason I'm voting for shorter days is that the remainder of this game really isn't so interesting. We can play it out, to see how the chips end up falling, but the days of pretending to be town are over, and the days of trying to figure things out are nearing an end, too. So the rest is just a game of diplomacy, like Rowain says.

As concepts go, the "majority are traitors" setup worked out better, because that game was destined to end quickly after the denouement. This game has essentially reached the same point but is going to drag out for a long time, still.

@Rowain. Bob asked us to vote on it, so I did. You are right though, and if you feel strongly against it I would be fine with giving you a veto.

[zakalwe]

My third ability (which I reveal now) is: "Ring the Bell": Bring the days voting to an end 5 minutes early.

This would actually be a pretty neat ability. I've considered it before as something to include in a role madness game.

[Mattimeo]

I'm sorry but voting to lynch me with help from commies would never ever been the right choice for you if you only have 3 votes. That is the illogical move from you.

If we assume the lack of night kills is going to continue (and given three straight nights completely lacking any deaths, you really can't say that's a poor assumption), it gives 4-2-3 tomorrow, and you *must* side with us against the Communists or you lose.

You know, exactly the same reasoning behind voting for any Anarchist, from a Fascist point of view.

Also, if we could pull Communists onto you, it might have galvanised you to come to your senses and vote for one of them, at which point we could join you. It'd put the 'do anything to get my team out of a lynch' onus on fascists, rather than anarchists, which I am 100% OK with.

[Shadeun]

My third ability (which I reveal now) is: "Ring the Bell": Bring the days voting to an end 5 minutes early.

This would actually be a pretty neat ability. I've considered it before as something to include in a role madness game.

Would be?