February 25th, 2010, 09:24
Posts: 2,585
Threads: 43
Joined: Apr 2008
Swiss Pauli Wrote:it's basic common sense to put signs up only after you've moved/fortfied your units.
I'm sorry but I disagree with this. Many of us playing are new to MP and I know this is exactly what happened to me when my scout move mis-click happened. Obviously, I've learned now that putting up signs when there are moves to be made is a bad idea, but to call that "basic common sense" assumes a lot. Experience builds common sense, it doesn't just come from no where.
Not speaking for our team here, but I'm in favor of granting the reload since we were granted one earlier.
February 25th, 2010, 09:41
Posts: 5,630
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
Unfortunately, it's been, what, 1 1/2 turns? The reload came from the end of T47 or early T48, and now it's T49. I'm sympathetic to your request, but it's asking a lot on everybody to have to replay that much time.
Please, in the future, pause when you're going to request a reload.
February 25th, 2010, 09:54
Posts: 272
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2009
I'm happy to labelled a jerk - if thats your opinion.
No reloads for misclicks lag or no lag. Maybe if teams could be a bit more organized and have a TURNPLAYER then this situation wouldn't happen - you'd not need every member to log in every turn.
/rant 
February 25th, 2010, 12:57
Posts: 2,504
Threads: 29
Joined: Oct 2009
I am having great difficulty getting online. I am working on my PC right now, please be aware that unless TT or Whosit are about, we might play a bit slower this turn. Apologies.
February 25th, 2010, 13:44
Posts: 4,443
Threads: 45
Joined: Nov 2009
Instead of getting one admin since most people are involved in PB1 and PB2, can we just have 3 people do the adminning and go with the 2/3rds? Then the bias will show through less.
February 25th, 2010, 13:55
Posts: 8,759
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
antisocialmunky Wrote:Instead of getting one admin since most people are involved in PB1 and PB2, can we just have 3 people do the adminning and go with the 2/3rds? Then the bias will show through less.
I nominate sooooo, sunrise089, and regoarrarr .
I think the problem is diplomatic fallout. I'd actually be fine letting Krill admin the game, I'm pretty confident he could and would keep the bias out of his decisions. Unfortunately, whoever he rules against is going to subconsciously give him a -1 relations hit.
Darrell
February 25th, 2010, 18:18
Posts: 2,788
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2009
darrelljs Wrote:I nominate sooooo, sunrise089, and regoarrarr .
I think the problem is diplomatic fallout. I'd actually be fine letting Krill admin the game, I'm pretty confident he could and would keep the bias out of his decisions. Unfortunately, whoever he rules against is going to subconsciously give him a -1 relations hit.
Darrell
The bigger problem is that the admins need to be able to read the spoiler threads of other teams to be able to get a fuller picture and also take into account any concerns that the teams may not want to have to post publicly, either for spoiler or diplo reasons. I don't see having an admin who can't view all the threads working.
February 25th, 2010, 19:41
Posts: 4,757
Threads: 21
Joined: Nov 2009
Let's just hurry up and build the U.N. and each team can send a delegate. :neenernee
February 26th, 2010, 05:48
Posts: 3,572
Threads: 20
Joined: Jan 2010
Whosit Wrote:Let's just hurry up and build the U.N. and each team can send a delegate. :neenernee
That's a good idea. Is anyone near Mass Media yet? :neenernee
February 26th, 2010, 09:40
Posts: 5,630
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
We're 213 turns away @ max research + tech trades. 
|
