Posts: 8,809
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Neat game Dark Saveant  .
Coeurva, that game felt very normal to me until 11. Qh7, then I was  , followed by  , followed by  . I rewound to 11 and was able to play it out in my head, the amazing thing is black never really had a choice.
Darrell
Posts: 8,809
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
The amazing thing is that wasn't even the game of the year:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1094915
Darrell
Posts: 2,273
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2005
(July 14th, 2017, 10:21)Coeurva Wrote: Reminded me of this game: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1259009
The way I learned that game was "oh, that's the double-check game". It did mention the uncertainty to the last move, though I think the author preferred castling because castling to checkmate is hilarious.
There's the "long castling" "problem" in Wikipedia's joke chess problems article, the problem by Tim Krabbé.
Tim Krabbé's also wrote Chess Curiosities, worth a read if you haven't. (There's plenty of material to archive binge on there.)
Posts: 8,809
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
According to the article I read the guy considered castling but was an engineer and found it inefficient to move two pieces when one would suffice. If only he'd been an artist!
Darrell
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
I was worried on Kasparov's behalf that he would get crushed and embarassed. He played the first day safe and managed three draws though. A good effort.
Holding that endgame against Nakamura with little time on the clock was impressive, even if Nakamura made a (in hindsight pretty obvious) mistake in trying to queen the h pawn instead of the a pawn.
Also I have to wonder if the organizers lured in Kasparov by picking a subpar set of wild cards for the tournament.
I have to run.
Posts: 8,809
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Six months ago I had to give my son a Queen, Rook, Bishop and Knight for him to have a shot. Now its down to just a Queen. Once he starts thinking more than one move ahead, he might end up decent  .
Darrell
December 7th, 2017, 04:55
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 58
Joined: Oct 2010
Google's AlphaZero Destroys Stockfish In 100-Game Match
This might be the start of a new era in (computer) chess: Google's machine learning AI takes on chess:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/google-s...game-match
December 7th, 2017, 12:27
Posts: 4,781
Threads: 25
Joined: Sep 2006
(December 7th, 2017, 04:55)Gustaran Wrote: Google's AlphaZero Destroys Stockfish In 100-Game Match
This might be the start of a new era in (computer) chess: Google's machine learning AI takes on chess:
https://www.chess.com/news/view/google-s...game-match
There's a bit of an * because AlphaZero got to play with opening's book will stockfish didn't and it was hyperbullet. I'm pretty sure they could have bumped it up to 24-hours and that would solve the problem.
December 7th, 2017, 13:53
(This post was last modified: December 7th, 2017, 13:54 by Gustaran.)
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 58
Joined: Oct 2010
That does not seem to be correct:
chessbase. com Wrote:Since AlphaZero did not benefit from any chess knowledge, which means no games or opening theory, it also means it had to discover opening theory on its own
Source: https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future...arns-chess
Interestingly, the article shows which openings AlphaZero played first and abandoned later in the learning process. As a matter of fact, the chessbase article as well as the academic paper seem to talk about 24 hours of deep learning, not 4.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01815.pdf
December 7th, 2017, 13:57
Posts: 8,809
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2006
Very interesting article...would love to see it take on Deep Blue at some appropriate point in time. And, of course, Magnus  .
Darrell
|