Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
Chess

Neat game Dark Saveant thumbsup.
Coeurva, that game felt very normal to me until 11. Qh7, then I was eek , followed by popcorn , followed by bow .  I rewound to 11 and was able to play it out in my head, the amazing thing is black never really had a choice.

Darrell
Reply

The amazing thing is that wasn't even the game of the year:

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1094915

Darrell
Reply

(July 14th, 2017, 10:21)Coeurva Wrote: Reminded me of this game: http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1259009

The way I learned that game was "oh, that's the double-check game".  It did mention the uncertainty to the last move, though I think the author preferred castling because castling to checkmate is hilarious.

There's the "long castling" "problem" in Wikipedia's joke chess problems article, the problem by Tim Krabbé.

Tim Krabbé's also wrote Chess Curiosities, worth a read if you haven't.  (There's plenty of material to archive binge on there.)
Reply

According to the article I read the guy considered castling but was an engineer and found it inefficient to move two pieces when one would suffice. If only he'd been an artist!

Darrell
Reply

I was worried on Kasparov's behalf that he would get crushed and embarassed. He played the first day safe and managed three draws though. A good effort.

Holding that endgame against Nakamura with little time on the clock was impressive, even if Nakamura made a (in hindsight pretty obvious) mistake in trying to queen the h pawn instead of the a pawn.

Also I have to wonder if the organizers lured in Kasparov by picking a subpar set of wild cards for the tournament.
I have to run.
Reply

Six months ago I had to give my son a Queen, Rook, Bishop and Knight for him to have a shot.  Now its down to just a Queen.  Once he starts thinking more than one move ahead, he might end up decent smile.

Darrell
Reply

Google's AlphaZero Destroys Stockfish In 100-Game Match

This might be the start of a new era in (computer) chess: Google's machine learning AI takes on chess:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/google-s...game-match

Reply

(December 7th, 2017, 04:55)Gustaran Wrote: Google's AlphaZero Destroys Stockfish In 100-Game Match

This might be the start of a new era in (computer) chess: Google's machine learning AI takes on chess:

https://www.chess.com/news/view/google-s...game-match

There's a bit of an * because AlphaZero got to play with opening's book will stockfish didn't and it was hyperbullet. I'm pretty sure they could have bumped it up to 24-hours and that would solve the problem.
Reply

That does not seem to be correct:

chessbase. com Wrote:Since AlphaZero did not benefit from any chess knowledge, which means no games or opening theory, it also means it had to discover opening theory on its own

Source: https://en.chessbase.com/post/the-future...arns-chess

Interestingly, the article shows which openings AlphaZero played first and abandoned later in the learning process. As a matter of fact, the chessbase article as well as the academic paper seem to talk about 24 hours of deep learning, not 4.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01815.pdf

Reply

Very interesting article...would love to see it take on Deep Blue at some appropriate point in time. And, of course, Magnus smile.

Darrell
Reply



Forum Jump: