|
As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer |
|
Pitboss 39 Organizing Thread
|
(March 22nd, 2018, 12:08)JR4 Wrote: I can easily see the attraction of a PBEM game but personally I enjoy the bigger maps with more players. While possible to set up a small Pitboss, I think we should aim for 7 players at a minimum. Okay, I can say I'm in now, seeing as how I was just eliminated early in PB38.  (March 27th, 2018, 11:43)Dark Savant Wrote:(March 22nd, 2018, 12:08)JR4 Wrote: I can easily see the attraction of a PBEM game but personally I enjoy the bigger maps with more players. While possible to set up a small Pitboss, I think we should aim for 7 players at a minimum. Ouch, that was tough luck in PB 38. I`m glad that you`re joining us in the next game, though. We have been discussing settings a bit. Do you have any strong preferences? As we are at 7 players now, it`s probably time to ask for a mapmaker to step forward. Is there anyone out there who would like to help us out? As soon as we have a mapmaker I think we`re closing the sign-ups. (March 27th, 2018, 13:05)JR4 Wrote:(March 27th, 2018, 11:43)Dark Savant Wrote: Okay, I can say I'm in now, seeing as how I was just eliminated early in PB38. There was one awful mistake I made there, but even with that, a lot still had to go wrong for that to happen at all. Quote:I`m glad that you`re joining us in the next game, though. We have been discussing settings a bit. Do you have any strong preferences? Pretty much anything goes, really. You could roll a map at random and it's unlikely I'll have ... that ... happen again.
im in for another pitboss.
 basically same settings at pb38? or what we looking at.
"Superdeath seems to have acquired a rep for aggression somehow.
![[Image: noidea.gif]](https://www.realmsbeyond.net/forums/images/smilies/noidea.gif) In this game that's going to help us because he's going to go to the negotiating table with twitchy eyes and slightly too wide a grin and terrify the neighbors into favorable border agreements, one-sided tech deals and staggered NAPs."-Old Harry. PB48. (March 27th, 2018, 19:05)superdeath Wrote: im in for another pitboss. Added. The majority wants to play with Rtr mod so yes, pretty close to the settings of PB 38. I do have a couple of questions to all players: Should we enable map trading or not? Also, we need to decide on a pick method. My preference is a snake pick in this kind of small Pitboss. What do you guys think?
I would prefer the same settings as PB38.
(March 28th, 2018, 12:14)yuris125 Wrote: No map trading until Paper (like in vanilla) Same here. I would prefer snake pick, but I can also live with random combinations.
Mods: RtR CtH
Pitboss: PB39, PB40, PB52, PB59 Useful Collections: Pickmethods, Mapmaking, Curious Civplayer Buy me a coffee |
