Posts: 174
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2009
If I may indulge in a bit of rumination on a dreary Friday afternoon:
I see a strong parallel in your experiences to the history of Russian warfare. The Russian method, demonstrated to great success in the Napoleonic wars as well as WWII, involves drawing the enemy deep into Russian territory, forcing the adversary to overextend his numbers and supply lines.
Once winter sets in, the enemy is then mercilessly pummeled by waves of impoverished and poorly armed [strike]peasants[/strike] [strike]serfs[/strike] Russians until attrition weakens the enemy allowing them to be driven out, (napoleon) or destroyed (Paulus, WWII)
I think the bits of conflict you've shared with us are very similar in character to this, for good reason. Like Russia, the Incan empire is marked by being very LARGE. This gives you the advantage the Russians had, and you used it just as well, drawing in the attacker, waiting for his supply lines to be long and for his stacks to split, and then striking with overwhelming numbers of inferior troops.
The comparisons to Russia will have to continue for you into the future as well, as once this conflict is over (like that in Russia) you will have to rebuild every bit as mercilessly as you fought!