PBEM?

[athlete4life10]

Actually thinking about it a bit more I think I'd prefer a regular NTT game. I wouldn't be fussed if I ended up in a CTON or AW game though...So note my preference for regular but either way is fine.

Athlete

[dazedroyalty]

Here's an update on the roster with preferences as they've been indicated:

dazedroyalty - NTT
Jowy - NTT
scooter
Serdoa
The Reverend Doctor
Twinkletoes - NTT, no AW
WarriorKnight
Nakor
SleepingMoogle
Athlete4life10 - NTT, restricted leaders, no AW

No one has requested Tech Trading yet.... interesting.

[Nakor]

NTT for me as well! And no AW please... war is not really my thing...

[athlete4life10]

Here's an update on the roster with preferences as they've been indicated:

Athlete4life10 - NTT, restricted leaders, no AW

Sorry what I meant Dazed was not restricted leaders, but some type of restriction on them such as the no FIN/PHI traits or everybody has to take a bottom tier trait such as PRO/CHM/IMP...something fun/unique/different...

Athlete

[Serdoa]

I prefer NTT too. I wrote it somewhere in this thread earlier but that is easy to miss with that many postings already.

AW and CTON: I would not refrain to play such a game but if I can decide I would rather not have it.

[scooter]

Here's an update on the roster with preferences as they've been indicated:

dazedroyalty - NTT
Jowy - NTT
scooter - NTT
Serdoa - NTT
The Reverend Doctor
Twinkletoes - NTT, no AW
WarriorKnight
Nakorn - NTT
SleepingMoogle
Athlete4life10 - NTT, restricted leaders, no AW

Updated. I think we can pretty much confirm at this point that we're looking at no tech trading for both games. All we need now is WarriorKnight to confirm that he's playing and a map maker(s). I'm considering making a new thread just for requesting a map maker, as this thread is flying so fast that any potential map makers might just be ignoring the thread .

[athlete4life10]

Here's an update on the roster with preferences as they've been indicated:

dazedroyalty - NTT
Jowy - NTT
scooter
Serdoa
The Reverend Doctor
Twinkletoes - NTT, no AW
WarriorKnight
Nakor
SleepingMoogle
Athlete4life10 - NTT, restricted leaders, no AW

No one has requested Tech Trading yet.... interesting.

How do we want to go about dividing the group into 2 games? Internally? Have somebody randomize it? I think regardless of the different combinations things would be pretty competitive in both...Perhaps we should do this prior to voting on any more settings? If we continue voting on stuff maybe we'll narrow it down that way though...

Athlete

[scooter]

I've thought randomly might be a fun way... I think the consensus is a very blind game, so there probably isn't much left to vote on if we leave all settings and map decisions to the map maker. Stuff like huts, ivory, size, difficulty, etc etc. I'm fine with leaving all of that up to the map maker. Given that, I don't think who ends up in which game really matters that much. Wouldn't mind the map maker just saying "okay these five are together and those five are together."

[dazedroyalty]

Sorry what I meant Dazed was not restricted leaders, but some type of restriction on them such as the no FIN/PHI traits or everybody has to take a bottom tier trait such as PRO/CHM/IMP...something fun/unique/different...

Athlete

I understood you, just didn't write it clearly! Sorry about that.

Unless someone comes out in the near future strongly wanting to play AW or tech trading, I suggest that we divide players into two groups and hammer out details within those groups.

EDIT:

Agree with Scooter.

[athlete4life10]

Agree with Scooter as well. I'm fine with letting the map maker completely randomize/choose things.

Athlete

NP Dazed!