scooter Wrote:I do tend to agree with sunrise, and I think if Sullla/Speaker were in the process of trying to circumvent a NAP like that, that people would be screaming bloody murder about playing 'honorably', but it seems like you're allowed to do that as long as you are either 'the good guys' or 'the underdogs'...
Jowy just flat-out told one team just now (Nakor?) to break a NAP, but when Whosit's team (the 'bad guy' aggressor with Rome) did that earlier the backlash was so heavy that Whosit actually changed his mind.
Diplomacy is never about honour, it's just all about who you upset and who you make happy. Break a NAP helping the majority of players take down the big guy = GOOD. Break a NAP to take down your neighbour to grow bigger = BAD. Breaking a NAP may default to bad but it's all opinion and the only opinion that really matters is the other players.