regoarrarr Wrote:Is the main thing why everyone wants 2nd half due to the no slaving when it's not your turn?
Now that everyone has screwed us by not letting us slave during OUR war, what if we propose that we move to the PB3 style, attacker can choose, but either side can slave at any point?
Didn't want to post this in the email thread because I don't want to unduly influence things, but I could if folks think it's a decent idea
I was thinking the same thing, that without the slaving restrictions, players might be more willing to play either half of the turn. That seems to be the real issue, anyway - who gets to play second. Jowy says he is unhappy about the rules now, but he sure didn't complain when he thought he could claim the second half of the turn.