I think some of you put too much emphasis on "winning" the game, using that motivation to explain this and that. Especially here at RB I expect to find more thinking not of this end-gaining kind. Personally, if I were playing, this is what I'd be playing for - ensuring the survival and prosperity of my own civilization, keeping honest relations and playing a solid game. Becoming an important presence. If you posit an absolute win as the only worthwhile goal, that just guarantees dirty play. Alas, as much as I'd like to back this up with action, my actual Civ skills are highly lacking.
So I agree with Sullla regarding Nakor's course of action. Even if they are successful in preventing India from staying #1, where does that leave Nakor? Will his course of action result in a better world for the HRE? Probably if he teamed up with Sullla, he would have more of a chance to grow and flourish as a civ.
So I agree with Sullla regarding Nakor's course of action. Even if they are successful in preventing India from staying #1, where does that leave Nakor? Will his course of action result in a better world for the HRE? Probably if he teamed up with Sullla, he would have more of a chance to grow and flourish as a civ.