Question for those of you somewhat objecting (rightfully so I think) to Morgan's post in Whosit's thread. Would the post have been acceptable had it simply been this:
"What in your opinion is the benefit to you for being involved in this war that makes it worth it to make such a long-range attack at great cost to you?"
In other words, asking the question without elaborating too much. I'm guessing the answer is yes but it's been so hotly debated lately that I'm curious what the concensus is on this case.
"What in your opinion is the benefit to you for being involved in this war that makes it worth it to make such a long-range attack at great cost to you?"
In other words, asking the question without elaborating too much. I'm guessing the answer is yes but it's been so hotly debated lately that I'm curious what the concensus is on this case.