Hi,
Sure, it does if the post-war #1 is weaker than the per-war #1. And what's the alternative - not joining the war and letting the current #1 win? The benefits of this war are that a) you gain friends because of the mutual struggle, and b) you change a situation from where someone is clearly winning to somebody else who might win.
Looking at the Apolyton demogame, Sulla had voiced his frustration (and rightfully so, IMHO) how the other teams didn't want to join us against PAL, the clear run-away civ. And now he blames the other teams for doing just that? I don't get it.
-Kylearan
Axiis Wrote:It just doesn't make sense to me to replace one clear #1 with another.
Sure, it does if the post-war #1 is weaker than the per-war #1. And what's the alternative - not joining the war and letting the current #1 win? The benefits of this war are that a) you gain friends because of the mutual struggle, and b) you change a situation from where someone is clearly winning to somebody else who might win.
Looking at the Apolyton demogame, Sulla had voiced his frustration (and rightfully so, IMHO) how the other teams didn't want to join us against PAL, the clear run-away civ. And now he blames the other teams for doing just that? I don't get it.
-Kylearan
There are two kinds of fools. One says, "This is old, and therefore good." And one says, "This is new, and therefore better." - John Brunner, The Shockwave Rider