novice Wrote:I disagree. B is unilaterally introducing new conditions to the NAP (do not attack C). They can't do that, that is equivalent to prematurely cancelling the NAP.
A NAP says simple : We don't attack you and You don't attack us.
The MDP only broadens the definition of us.
Again had they kept it secret then yes any blame would be on them but so everyone knows what an attack on one of those 2 triggers.
To attack now one of the 2 MDP-partners and whining about that the other declared war and so broke the NAP is idiotic.
Everyone is now warned and should act accordingly.