Fine, then I'll restate my hypothetical to:
We agree to an NAP. I tell you that I will declare war if you settle north of a given line (modifying the agreement to include a settling division). You settle north of the line, I declare war. Did I break the NAP?
Edit: I could also mention such things as "I will declare war if you trade with X" or "I will declare war if you start to research Civil Service". ANYTHING can be considered an aggressive act looked at the right way, so allowing either party to arbitrarily redefine what constitutes an aggressive act makes the NAP completely meaningless.
We agree to an NAP. I tell you that I will declare war if you settle north of a given line (modifying the agreement to include a settling division). You settle north of the line, I declare war. Did I break the NAP?
Edit: I could also mention such things as "I will declare war if you trade with X" or "I will declare war if you start to research Civil Service". ANYTHING can be considered an aggressive act looked at the right way, so allowing either party to arbitrarily redefine what constitutes an aggressive act makes the NAP completely meaningless.