Here's Sullla referring to Jowy's back-to-back turns:
http://http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/sh...#post64873
This was T140. The peace treaty was signed T122 or T123, although a NAP ran through T150. So while technically in-game Spullla could have declared war on Jowy at any moment, forcing Jowy to act as though Spullla might break the NAP at any moment seems more than a little over-paranoid.
That is a different situation from "I've got NAPs running out left and right, and I just whipped an army of longbows," and while IMHO Jowy was clearly OK to play his turns in succession, I don't have a clear opinion on the ideal set of actions in slaze's situation; he might not have the time to play the turn much later.
http://http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/sh...#post64873
This was T140. The peace treaty was signed T122 or T123, although a NAP ran through T150. So while technically in-game Spullla could have declared war on Jowy at any moment, forcing Jowy to act as though Spullla might break the NAP at any moment seems more than a little over-paranoid.
That is a different situation from "I've got NAPs running out left and right, and I just whipped an army of longbows," and while IMHO Jowy was clearly OK to play his turns in succession, I don't have a clear opinion on the ideal set of actions in slaze's situation; he might not have the time to play the turn much later.