Jowy Wrote:No. They're relevant whenever you gain advantage by double-moving instead of letting your opponent move in-between. One case we discussed early on was settlers. I'd definately put this right into the same category, and what makes it worse is that Spullla made it with full understanding that it's a shady move. Perhaps they've already learned from the past cases that they can do whatever they want.
Where exactly in the rules does it say anywhere you gain an advantage? Krill's double move rule as currently written only deals with war. I agree it might be against the faith of the rule, but I don't think it is actually against the rule.