sunrise089 Wrote:Regoarrarr/darrell style:
@TT and Selrahc: I've raised this in another thread, but keep in mind that some people take NAPs much more seriously than others. If S+S signed a NAP with Athlete some (read: sunrise089) would say they don't have a right to break it. If they want to be able to break it over gifted cities the time to agree to that was when the NAP was being negotiated.
I wasn't talking about the Jowy gifting to Athlete problem.
I said that after being 'burned' by that situation, they could have possibly stopped slaze taking some of athlete's cities by stating what i suggested when they declared against Kathlete.
As far as I am aware, they have no NAP with slaze so it would not break a NAP to DOW slaze for taking ill-gotten cities
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."