MWIN Wrote:@Krill, I think players are not sharing the same enthusiasm as lurkers. If Nakor doesnât understand the rule breaking then make him understand. But after that, it should be his decisionâ¦.
Also, did anybody notice, all dispute in this game so far involved Spullla. There were wars that did not involve Spullla and all of them played in a reasonable spirit.
MWIN, I do not want to say that Spullla did not try to take every advantage they could but in my opinion what you wrote implies that Spullla is the reason for that what might be a little bit unfair. Yes the disputes involved always Spullla. But if I remember correctly many of them were stirred up by lurkers finding out that they did not obey to the rules - most of the time only because Spullla themselves did post very openly in their thread what they were doing.
Now, is it possible that in the other wars something was not done like it should have been by the rules? Maybe, though none of the players does even write remotely as accurate reports as Spullla are doing so lurkers do not have a chance to catch them. For example I do not have a clue what happened in the slaze-athlete wars.
I do not want to say that the lurkers should not mention if they find something, but I think it is kind of obvious that Spullla is involved in all disputes because they are one of the few (if not the only ones) reporting extensively and therefore one of the few were we lurkers are able to catch those "errors".