RBP2 Lurker Discussion Thread - No Players!

[MWIN]

You are correct. I never said I am impartial. It is just Sullla should have been more acknowledging of their errors, rather than opposing any thing that they don't like.

Other than finding faults Spullla’s game and bashing them because of it, I think most of my other posts are of softer tone. What is the fun in it, if everybody supports Spullla….

I think Serdoa is exactly right.

Agree.

To that end, I am personally of the opinion that lurkers should NOT be a part of rule enforcement. Otherwise we create a situation that discourages the very thing we want to encourage.

The only thing I want to add is that, rule breakings do happen. Ratherthan making a decision as a game admin, Krill should try and explain the situation to both players and let them decide.

While I'm posting, Speaker's attitude towards Krill has definitely been innappropriate. However, I also think that Krill has assumed more authority than he necessarily needs to. He was originally called in to make a decision regarding a dispute that the players needed settled. It was not clearly dictated what the continuing role of a "admin" would be. Based on the original need, though, it would seem the game admin should be the person to step in and settle conflict when it arises--not the person who is actively policing the game. That is what the players should be doing for themselves.