Hang on, did anyone read this rule closely?
Bolding added by me. The problem, as I understand it, is that a rule was broken because moves were made as such:
Spullla attacks a city
Dantski attacks same city
Spullla attacks a stack outside that city
thus interleaving their attacks. But the rule only prohibits interleaving attacks against a single target. The third attack was against a separate target, which is not prohibited.
Krill Wrote:If two players want to attack a single target ie a city belonging to a third party, Civ C, then they must move sequentially. ie Civ A attacks with all of its' units, and then Civ B attacks with all of its' units during the phase of the turn belonging to them. Civ C must wait until the phase of the turn belonging to it before it may counter attack or promote any units etc as proscribed above.
Bolding added by me. The problem, as I understand it, is that a rule was broken because moves were made as such:
Spullla attacks a city
Dantski attacks same city
Spullla attacks a stack outside that city
thus interleaving their attacks. But the rule only prohibits interleaving attacks against a single target. The third attack was against a separate target, which is not prohibited.