Posts: 3,750
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2016
(May 17th, 2020, 17:16)Quagma Blast Wrote: I can roll the civs. Rerolls should come out of the list of civs not claimed during the first round of picks, right? And I assume with a prohibition against getting back either of the civs you decided to reroll away from.
Yes, you've got that correct. Thanks for doing the rolls for us! 
Posts: 179
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2016
No problem. I have neither the capability nor the fortitude to mapmake, but rolling civs is simple enough that I can contribute that way.
Posts: 3,014
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,375
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
(May 14th, 2020, 22:10)Woden Wrote: My thought on the pillage-farming city states is if we ban all pillaging except for health, it is inevitable that someone will forget and pillage a mine, then we have to come up with some equal value punishment. If we leave it at no pillage-farming them, i.e. attack to take the city, then it seems easier to remember and pretty clear cut.
But, as usual, I am open to pretty much anything.
Agree there. If you dow a CS you must do so for real.
Posts: 5,874
Threads: 52
Joined: Apr 2012
(May 17th, 2020, 15:53)Woden Wrote: Cornflakes, you are making the map, correct? Do you need anything else from us to get that process going? Pangaea map, small size, standard settings, 10 city states.
Working overtime now and crazy busy but I should be able to get it this weekend.
Posts: 4,375
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
Last response by Ioan was on the 14th May. I really do not want another PBEM 17 pace. Shall we go with 4 or hope for the best?
Posts: 179
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2016
Yeah, I was planning to say earlier today (before I got distracted) that I've got everyone's first-round picks in but Ioan, and he hasn't responded to me at all. I might suggest giving him another day to respond and just drop him if he hasn't gotten back to me by ~24 hours from now, but I can see the argument that he's already demonstrated potential pace issues.
Posts: 4,375
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
(May 19th, 2020, 02:30)Quagma Blast Wrote: Yeah, I was planning to say earlier today (before I got distracted) that I've got everyone's first-round picks in but Ioan, and he hasn't responded to me at all. I might suggest giving him another day to respond and just drop him if he hasn't gotten back to me by ~24 hours from now, but I can see the argument that he's already demonstrated potential pace issues.
Sounds good.
Posts: 3,750
Threads: 13
Joined: Dec 2016
I agree with dropping Ioan76 from the lineup if we don't hear back in a reasonable time.
May 19th, 2020, 21:40
(This post was last modified: May 19th, 2020, 21:43 by Quagma Blast.)
Posts: 179
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2016
While the time limit I mentioned in my posted hasn't quite ended, I'm not going to hold out much hope for Ioan's return, especially not given that I'm probably going to bed earlier than usual tonight. Now's a good time to talk about how we want to deal with the impact on setup:
1) The simplest option is to just keep going, treating Ioan's options as being tossed back into the pool with a reroll.
1b) Alternatively, since he didn't get to properly fish out 'good picks', I could cast them out from the repick pool and only give people civs that were *actually* rejected.
2) You could replace him with a refugee from the (impending?) collapse of PBEM 17, if there's anyone over there that isn't burned out and hasn't already jumped onto this one.
3) Or, we could restart the whole picking process with the proposal on page 6 of adding two more civs to the pool and handing 3 options to everyone.
|
