December 10th, 2012, 10:59
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Mattimeo's always playing for his own survival, though. It was an issue last game as well.
I have to run.
December 10th, 2012, 11:00
Posts: 17,545
Threads: 79
Joined: Nov 2005
(December 10th, 2012, 07:16)Ichabod Wrote: My Pindicator vote was based on the fact that I didn't like his Zakalwe vote for mayor. The "I can read him well" justification just don't cut to me, since then you should vote for yourself. Besides, I think it's better to vote for someone that hunts wolves well (zak is good at it, but that was not the reason Pindicator gave). And, as pretentious as it may sound, I thought Pindicator was going to vote for me as mayor (not only him, but he was one of the people I thought would vote for me), since I played good villager games last two games. Voting Zak is also a good way to get him out of your shoes, because Zak is, to me, a bit prone to let people slide in those types of situations.
So, I voted to see his reaction and it was better not to justify my vote. His reaction was interesting, I agree that it was defensive (he didn't ask for my reasoning, he attacked me/tried to put my vote in a bad light as following someone), also worth noticing that he didn't vote for me, despite that.
Ichabod
Quick post before goign to work, but me being Pacific Time Zone means I'm sleeping when most of the talking was going on. I was going to vote for you this morning until I got here. But what's with the bolded part (my bold) -- I definitely asked for your reasoning; in fact I used those specific words:
(December 9th, 2012, 18:47)pindicator Wrote: Ichabod- care to share your reasoning with the group?
Hard for me to vote for you for mayor when you're making gaffs like that.
December 10th, 2012, 11:00
Posts: 2,511
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2012
Sorry, was trying to explain my not coming out and just voting qgqqqqq with my first post.
As uberfish pointed out in others' posts, I was "playing in a deliberately neutral fashion". I felt he was suspicious, but when lurking last game, I felt the same. Also felt the same in previous games I played with him. I did find Serdoa's post quite convincing, I thought that it was clear - he's confirming my initial read.
Zak, i was annoyed at myself in the mafia game where I kept referring to the scum faction as wolves. Now I see in the pre-game post "there will be wolves" but the story doesnt seem clear on that. I too am a little concerned about lack of other candidates, but it's still early.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
December 10th, 2012, 11:04
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(December 10th, 2012, 10:59)novice Wrote: Mattimeo's always playing for his own survival, though. It was an issue last game as well.
Yeah, but the logic in last game was better. Last game you asked me my opinion on Matt during Day 2. I waffled a bit but eventually said I thought he was innocent. I eventually voted for him in the end when it came down between him and Coco. But I really regretted that all game because my initial read was his innocence. This game however I'm simply not getting the same vibe as I was last game. The argument is clumsier and dissembling. Maybe we don't lynch him today, but I'm probably going to vote for him because so far to me his actions having been the scummiest and the most in line with the play I remember from Matt on my scum team.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
December 10th, 2012, 11:31
Posts: 2,511
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2012
Well, I posted without seeing posts 101-110. It seems that there are some additional candidates, namely Mattimeo and Ichabod. I can't argue with what loki put forth, but I don't see a lot of strength in the ichabod case.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
December 10th, 2012, 11:56
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
Let's go with Mattimeo, then.
I'm not saying you shouldn't defend yourself, Mattimeo. I'm saying that it seems more like you're trying to justify your actions rather than honestly explaining what you were thinking.
If you know what I mean.
December 10th, 2012, 12:08
(This post was last modified: December 10th, 2012, 13:11 by Tasunke.)
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
SEMI-OFFICIAL VOTE COUNT
(report any errors please)
Mayor Tally
Serdoa(5)-Rowain, Slowcheetah, Waterbat, Uberfish, Azza, Serdoa
Uberfish (2) - Novice, Mattimeo
Bigger (2) Lewwen, Bigger
MJW (2) – MJW
Zakalwe (1) - Zakalwe
Ichabod (1) – Slowcheetah, Ichabod
Pindicator (1) Qgqqqq
Lynch Tally
Qgqqqq(5) – Mattimeo, Serdoa, Waterbat, Ubershark, Azza
Ichabod(3)- Rowain, Novice, Slowcheetah
Mattimeo(2)-Zakalwe, Lewwen
Azza (1) - Bigger
Pindicator (1) Ichabod
Selrahc (1) –, MJW
Novice (1) – Pindicator
Uberfish(1)- Azza
December 10th, 2012, 12:28
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
You have Arizzona voting for me as mayor. If that name should be Azza (I am really not sure...) then you are missing my vote for myself.
In the lynch-tally you have at least Qgqqqq voting twice, once for uberfish, once for Azza.
Also I'd like to request that the player-names are written as they are, not with some changes, no matter if they sound funny or not. I don't want to guess who could be meant nor is it easy to keep track if someone is called differently in every single tally. Thanks.
December 10th, 2012, 12:31
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
I'm voting Ichabod, but I'm not voting Lewwyn.
I have to run.
December 10th, 2012, 12:39
Posts: 4,777
Threads: 25
Joined: Sep 2006
Well, Selrahc has not posted so my vote stays were it is... I will look over the thread now. I will probably change my mayor vote now that uberfish is no longer voting for me.
|