LURZKERS THREAD (for siege of the dragon)

[Qgqqqqq]

Bigger.

Agree. there were what, 450 posts yesterday?
And another 100 in the 32(ish) hours since.

You have to remember though, they've been pruned a lot.

Thanks smile

I was particularly proud of Zakelroy and Ubershark. (the names)

btw, are Qgqqqqq and MJW the same person?

Adding to my response earlier: from what I've read over the past few days, MJW normally spams tons of meta-related posts. I otoh am forced to spam, bit avoid meta like the plague since WW15, and generally focus on defence/highlighting scum-tells. Again because my phone makes it hard for me to review the thread I generally see the need to analyse any points that I come across, as opposed to waiting for a chance to make an actual case.

Then again, I'm spamming a bucnch here.

[Qgqqqqq]

Slowcheetah I like your posts and I think they are pretty well thought out, but your attack on me is strange.

First I never "dropped" Zak's case. I voted for him first thing in the day, but it's two days slowcheetah. I wasn't just going to sit on him for two days while doing nothing else. That is a poor use of our only resource, time. I've done that before, sit on someone all day, and I've been wrong and it got me nothing. SO I voted for Matt to A) stir things up and B) see who would follow me. Unfortunately the villager has been so damn quiet that there wasn't really any movement until I went to bed.
...

WW17.
Never forget.
Never forgive.







(Just joking, we love ya )

[pindicator]

Watch Lewwyn be scum now

[novice]

I think Zak is innocent. His explanation of how he saw Qgqqqq on day 1 matched what I was thinking on day 1. So apparently we shared the same flawed thinking there.

Also, Zak doesn't know it but his actions today are almost sure to get him lynched.

[Qgqqqqq]

Wow the village is being stupid today - paticularly Lewwyn/Azza.
They cant asses everyones scumminess based off me (I have only 1-2 partners and therefore only 1-2 people would try to protect me - so far I've seen waterbat, zak, mat, MJW, even Lewwyn(!) accused of it.

Look at Ichabod for how scum tend to behave around serdoa

Look at meee for how scum ought to play around serdoa

[novice]

Yeah that's a lot of kills... if Novice or Pindicator were killed by some stupid vigilante I shall be extremely annoyed.

Looks like it's time for you to get extremely annoyed.

Why do vigilantes keep insisting on using their abilities anyway?

[pindicator]

Yeah that's a lot of kills... if Novice or Pindicator were killed by some stupid vigilante I shall be extremely annoyed.

Looks like it's time for you to get extremely annoyed.

Why do vigilantes keep insisting on using their abilities anyway?

I hope that you know you were killed by a vig, cause if I was killed by a vig...

(Although I should probably rant against either of us, b/c neither of us would make sense as vig shots.)

Also, zak probably is innocent. One thing that didn't make sense for me was why a pack would expose both their members like that. All their eggs in one basket by blatantly defending Q? That's very risky. We saw it from Serdoa last game because he had other wolves, but it's more like when we were lynching TT and how Azza played. That's how I expect a wolf would play alongside Q. (Why wasn't I thinking like this during night 1?)

[uberfish]

Zakalwe is a good kill anyway because he was actually suspicious, you guys weren't.

In general vigilantes should be killing suspicious or lurking players and not going for heroic shots on "deep cover scum that are fooling the rest of the village" imo.

[Ichabod]

Am I getting this right: Waterbat is going to kill Zak at the end of day 2? If this is a plan by Zak and Waterbat to avoid Zak's lynch, hats off for them.

[pindicator]

Am I getting this right: Waterbat is going to kill Zak at the end of day 2? If this is a plan by Zak and Waterbat to avoid Zak's lynch, hats off for them.

Kind of hard to see them as a scum team though...