September 17th, 2017, 16:47
Posts: 1,632
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2016
@Jester,
want to send a delegation too?
September 17th, 2017, 17:03
Posts: 1,257
Threads: 5
Joined: Nov 2011
(September 17th, 2017, 16:47)Singaboy Wrote: @Jester,
want to send a delegation too? Totally forgot. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16337/16337e754205579a91247a58974ed678b6a72a8f" alt="duh duh" Will do.
Global lurker data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d404/0d4042b15d30f965121d702b660fea271f98c7bd" alt="smile smile" ; played in Civ VI PBEM 4, 5, 15; DL suboptimal Civ VI PBEM 17
September 18th, 2017, 03:43
Posts: 4,465
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
(September 17th, 2017, 08:37)Woden Wrote: @TheArchduke: No problem on attacking Stockholm. A little disappointing as I was planning the same, you just beat me to it. I am good with a defensive pact, should we say a NAP and DP until T130, a nice round number. Open to longer or short periods. Just let me know.
Until turn 130 sounds wonderful.
@ Oledavy
Just a short war, nobody except builders and a civic boost will be harmed.
September 22nd, 2017, 12:50
Posts: 4,465
Threads: 67
Joined: Dec 2006
As soon as we can sign peace, Oledavy, I would like to extend an offer of a NAP to you as well for 30 turns.
September 22nd, 2017, 13:58
Posts: 4,272
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
(September 22nd, 2017, 12:50)TheArchduke Wrote: As soon as we can sign peace, Oledavy, I would like to extend an offer of a NAP to you as well for 30 turns.
Consider it done, we have no quarrel this game.
On an related note, can I just express how glad I am we didn't start next to each other this time around
September 22nd, 2017, 14:00
Posts: 4,272
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
@Japper007
I've been distracted with RL concerns the past week (thus the lack of posts in my thread of late). But, I just want to say, kudos on your defensive moves over the last few turns. Really nice job grabbing Defensive Tactics and getting Bastions online in the nick of time.
Just as a heads up, there is a German caravel coming around the headland, sailing towards Jotunheim from the west. My navy is attempting to delay it and intercept.
Hold Strong!
September 22nd, 2017, 17:44
Posts: 1,632
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2016
Woden, would you like to sign a NAP with me running for 30 turns with a potential for an alliance down the road. With Archduke and myself to your west and oledavy to your east, it might be good to have one less threat to worry about.
What do you say?
September 22nd, 2017, 20:59
Posts: 3,090
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2017
(September 22nd, 2017, 17:44)Singaboy Wrote: Woden, would you like to sign a NAP with me running for 30 turns with a potential for an alliance down the road. With Archduke and myself to your west and oledavy to your east, it might be good to have one less threat to worry about.
What do you say?
A NAP and potential alliance would be agreeable with me under an understanding that I have a defensive pack with TheArchduke, so if you attack him, I may be forced to break it.
September 22nd, 2017, 23:09
(This post was last modified: September 22nd, 2017, 23:09 by Singaboy.)
Posts: 1,632
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2016
@Woden.
I understand the implication of your deal with Archduke. Can I assume that this would only apply if I attack Archduke. If it were the other way round you would remain neutral. Is that agreeable? If so, shall we have this NAP with the special condition running from now until T130 (as we are already into T107)?
September 22nd, 2017, 23:31
Posts: 3,090
Threads: 14
Joined: Apr 2017
@Singaboy,
Yes, if TheArchduke attacks you, I would stay neutral for the duration of the NAP. T130 works for me with this special condition.
|