WW15 - Chiron is a harsh mistress

[Sareln]

I have to say that Bob's reasoning on the Sareln matter makes a lot of sense, quickly switching from one dubious claim to another does seem rather fishy.

I only have one post (this one makes two). How can I switch from one claim to another?

[Catwalk]

I'm going to vote Molach on grounds of his low activity. He's done this succesfully as a wolf once before (or was it twice?). And his posts look suspicious too, quick accusation that he doesn't bother following up on and then a safe post stating that he has no name.

[BRickAstley]

I got confused about which person switched, I messed up reading the posts cause apparently I can't read. My vote is withdrawn until I actually have my head screwed on straight.

[Sareln]

Re-read all that and keep in mind what order everything happened in this time

1. You vote Novice as your "joke" vote.
   
2. Bob votes Novice with some reasoning.
   
3. You criticize Bob for his reasoning.
   

I don't see the problem here... just because a vote is in the early period where votes are flying fast and furious doesn't mean that vote means nothing. I guess that puts me in rather vehement disagreement with a lot of people now.

I am also nameless, fwiw.

[slowcheetah]

1. just because a vote is in the early period where votes are flying fast and furious doesn't mean that vote means nothing. I guess that puts me in rather vehement disagreement with a lot of people now.

You're right, but at that point there are so many confused villagers blundering around, making trusting early votes for a lead pretty high risk.

I'm going to follow Catwalk's reasoning onMolach, I was voting Sareln for his penchant towards lurkerdom, but he's said more than Molach at this point.

[Tasunke]

Just want to plug in that I am also NAMELESS.

[Tasunke]

Grr ... and I wanted to have a name ever so badly

I acknowledge that my Chairman Yang vote has no validity, even though I was meaning Brickastley because he said he was the Chairman ...

In any case, it was a joke vote, so no need to formalize it by voting the actual name, I suppose.

[Bigger]

Official vote tally (please correct me if I have any mistakes):

Sareln (3) - Injera, bobchillingsworth,
Qgqqqqqq (3) - Maniac, zak, serdoa
Pind (2) - Lewwyn, sareln
Maniac (2)- Qgqqqqqq, waterbat
molach (2)- Catwalk, slowcheetah
thestick - molach
Novice - Pindicator
Lewwyn - meiz
BrickAstley - jkaen
Injera - Tasunke
waterbat - thestick
seralhc - novice

Not voting: Selrahc, mattimeo, brickastley

[Tasunke]

Odd. I thought invalid votes counted as, well, invalid ... rather than an unvote.

Which would mean that I am still voting for Injera at the moment.

[Bigger]

Odd. I thought invalid votes counted as, well, invalid ... rather than an unvote.

Which would mean that I am still voting for Injera at the moment.

my bad, yes your injera vote is still valid.