November 25th, 2012, 06:12
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(November 25th, 2012, 06:10)pling Wrote: (November 25th, 2012, 06:08)uberfish Wrote: Given how many mistakes I make on the vote counts I'm not sure I needed to worry that much about being metagamed though
Nah, WW players can metagame everything even and especially when told it's not going to reveal anything ... 
I know I can. 
I have to run.
November 25th, 2012, 06:14
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
I found the Eddard Stark claim speculation quite amusing
November 25th, 2012, 06:15
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(November 25th, 2012, 06:12)Bigger Wrote: (November 25th, 2012, 05:54)zakalwe Wrote: We could have made a great scum hunting team though, as we really were on the same wavelength, earlier. So I am sorry for that lost opportunity.
Sorry for being defensive, but I catch enough flak as is in these games, IMHO.
I'm getting very tired of the "where are the village leaders" bullshit that pops up every time I make it to day 3.
we've been on the same wavelength day 1 every game that we were both villagers. Its one (of several) ways that I read you, tbh, and its why the only game I tried to lynch you was ww12 (where I was village and you were scum). You've always read me innocent initially, but end up changing your mind eventually  .
And you don't need to be defensive, I don't blame you as much as it seems. I just realized that 3 of the 5 people that voted for me were scum, though - and thats assuming Pindicator is innocent. And Pindicator's vote was mostly defensive anyway. (I consider novice's role scum, since he's useless to the village). So I don't have many people to bitch at this time, I guess. I did call out thestick and Rowain, and would be cursing a storm at TT if he had ended up being innocent  .
Yeah Bigger, I voted you solely for my own survival. I don't think I was useless to the village though, in fact I probably played it way too protown. It's just more fun that way, and it's pretty random anyway what survival strategy succeeds when there are multiple factions on the loose.
I have to run.
November 25th, 2012, 06:18
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
I think everybody that voted for me had a completely different reason. very bizarre.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
November 25th, 2012, 08:44
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(November 25th, 2012, 05:48)zakalwe Wrote: I don't see why I deserve a bigger share of the blame than anyone else.
Just to clarify... I don't see why I deserve a bigger share of the blame than anyone else who voted for an innocent.
If you know what I mean.
November 25th, 2012, 09:29
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(November 25th, 2012, 08:44)zakalwe Wrote: Just to clarify... I don't see why I deserve a bigger share of the blame than anyone else who voted for an innocent.
Because people are following you. This gives you special responsibility, more glory and more blame.
I'm quite sure, should Mardoc turn up as innocent it will be your fault too  .
About me: I can live with getting accused on dubious voting/last minute jumps/faulty reasoning but I have a deep loathing to getting accused on BS like it happened last game and this.
@Bigger what do you expect on day 1?
November 25th, 2012, 09:41
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Remember Rowain, I was one of your biggest questioners this game. It was just something useful to talk about, and I was hoping maybe we'd flush out some town power roles that could draw nightkills.
I have to run.
November 25th, 2012, 14:49
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
(November 25th, 2012, 09:29)Rowain Wrote: (November 25th, 2012, 08:44)zakalwe Wrote: Just to clarify... I don't see why I deserve a bigger share of the blame than anyone else who voted for an innocent.
Because people are following you. This gives you special responsibility, more glory and more blame.
I'm quite sure, should Mardoc turn up as innocent it will be your fault too .
About me: I can live with getting accused on dubious voting/last minute jumps/faulty reasoning but I have a deep loathing to getting accused on BS like it happened last game and this.
@Bigger what do you expect on day 1?
for people not to make the same mistakes every single day 1. Is that too much to ask?
Additionally, TT,thestick, and novice all had really sketchy (independent) reasons for voting for me, and that should have set up a red flag for you, zak, and Pin
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
November 25th, 2012, 15:14
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
I love how everyone complains about how bad other people's votes on THEMSELVES are, while votes on anyone else are fine
November 25th, 2012, 15:17
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(November 25th, 2012, 12:39)Tasunke Wrote: I would suggest to Lewwyn that he not use his Vig shot tonight. For one thing, it would give evidence that he is not a second serial killer. IE: assuming 1 wolf pack and 2 alternating serial killers, Lewwyn could be a second serial killer. I think its equally likely that we have 1 alternating serial killer/ 1 alternating vig, and 2 alternating serial killers ... but I think if Lewwyn chooses not to kill tonight, we can probably see him as a vigilante.
This is backwards. If there's only 1 kill tonight Lewwyn could be scum. If there's two, he's telling the truth and is a vigilante. There's no way there's another serial killer out there.
I have to run.
|
